They were the same size in the 1850s, but Brive gets the railroad and not Tulle, the railroad from Paris.
它们在十九世纪五十年代还是一样大的,但是布瑞福修了铁路,而不是图勒,通往巴黎的铁路
which means that... I didn't like some of my classes in high school, like science,
这样的话,我就不必像高中一样,明明不喜欢科学,可还是要上科学课,
If everything is the same, you know, when you were a kid someone would say, which has a higher boiling point, a quart of water or a gallon of water?
如果每个东西都一样,当你是个还是一个孩子的时候,有人说,那个有更高的沸点,1夸脱水还是1加仑水?
Now in fairness, that particular problem kind of happened because so many companies ended up running so much code for many more years than the programmers actually thought they would be running it, but the idea is still the same.
公平起见,那个问题有时会发生,因为实际上,很多企业在这么多年里运行了,比程序员多得多的代码,虽然他们将运行它,但那个构想还是一样的。
The poiceman are still mainly iliterate as much as the soilders and there seen very much part of the problem in the countryside.
这些警察还是几乎和士兵一样,大部分是文盲,农村的问题更为突出。
It's possible that the causes of death are the same; it's possible they've changed, but we'll see.
可能死亡原因还是一样的,也可能已经不同,我们一会儿就知道了
Now it's all electronic and it's done by the Internet, but it's the same thing.
现在一切都是电子化操作,通过互联网就可以实现,但本质上还是一样的。
It's defined in many ways that "no pain, to gain" paradigm, whether it's education of doctors or in school, as well as generally in the workplace.
它在很多方面定义了“不劳无获,不论是对医生的教育还是在学校,在一般的工作场所也一样。
It's still the same central processing unit,or so it seems to me.
在我看来是中央处理器还是一样的。
Again, stand up and shout in that mike.
还是一样,请起立对着麦克大声讲
I think it's still the same deal.
我觉得还是一样的。
Yes, it's a wonderfully reliable test I'll test you today; I'll test you tomorrow; I'll test you next year; I'll test you the day you die; I'll get the same IQ score ? Is it a valid test?
是的,这是个非常可靠的测试,今天测试,明天再测试;,明年再测,到你死的那天再测;,得出的你的智商都还是一样,但这是个有效测试吗?
Do they require more of Hobbes' men of natural timorousness or do they require ? more Ralph Espositos?
它更需要霍布斯那种,自然胆怯的人还是,像Ralph,Espositos一样勇敢的人?
So, how many distinct, so again, we're talking about distinct kinetic energies, a spectrum for the element hafnium, 72 and I'll tell you here that it has a z of 72, so you don't have to spend two minutes searching your periodic table.
好,有多少分立的……还是一样,我们讨论的还是不同的动能,铪元素的光谱中出现,而且我来告诉大家铪的原子序数是,这样你就不用因为在元素周期表中找它,而花费两分钟的时间了。
But really, the costume's the same one, right?
但是,他穿的衣服还是一样的,对吧?
That too, was ultimately, a Greek source.
归根结底,它也一样,根还是希腊的
There's always the sense that Dean evades him, and I think part of that sense of an evading object of desire is, again, the pursuit of sex in this novel; it's part of the pursuit of sex.
总有种感觉好像迪恩在躲着他,而且我想这种回避的部分要求,一样,在这小说里还是对性的追求。
And then I'm going to do a similar thing to print things out. But would the solver do?
然后我还是一样要把结果输出来,那solver做的是什么呢?
We're singing below middle C and the ladies are singing up an octave but that's still monophonic texture-- those notes have the same names.
我们唱得比中央c低,而女士们高了一个八度,但这还是单音织体,这些音的音名是一样的
Same reason, I assume.
我猜理由还是一样。
The top of this program is the same.
开头还是一样。
And we're asking: Is that the very same space-time worm as the one we picked out previously or a different space-time worm ? than the one we picked out previously?
然后我们问:,这条时空虫,跟我们之前指的一样吗,还是和我们之前指的,不是同一条时空虫?
Nothing would be easier.
问题还是一样的
int No. Even though the key word has changed from char to int, the * is the same and the fact that I've got a * there is saying this is a pointer to an int or a pointer to a char pointers are always the same size on a computer.
不,即使即使关键字从char变成了,指针的大小还是一样的,我用*表示这是一个int型指针,而不是char型指针,在同一台机子上,它们的大小是一样的。
The thing is still not dominated and we could still have done exactly the same analysis, and actually you can see I'm not very far off in the numbers I made up, but things are not perfectly symmetric.
这虽然不能成为劣势策略,但我们还是能得出一样的分析结果,实际上这和我编的数字相差也不是很远,凡事并不总是绝对对称的嘛
So in a sense, it's all the same to me as a shareholder whether they pay dividends or they repurchase shares.
所以某种意义上,对股东来说是一样的,不管是支付股利还是回购股票
Is the soul invisible in the way that the forms are, being indestructable, or is it invisible in the way that radio waves are, destructible.
灵魂的无形,是和形式的无形一样不可毁灭,还是和无线电波的无形一样,是可以毁灭的。
So what I do is I take the blocks and I put them back together building a tower, in the very same shape, in the very same structure, the very same order as the tower my son had built.
所以我就拿出积木,重新搭了一座塔,不管是形状,结构还是,积木的排列顺序,都和我儿子搭的一模一样。
Maybe there is a difference there, I don't have a good theory as to what the difference is, since I don't have a good theory to what the difference is, I'm not in a good position to decide whether a reassembled body would be ? the same body or different body?
也许这两个案例是有不同,我没有充分的理论来,解释这两者之间的不同,由于我无法解释两者的不同,我也就无法去下结论,究竟重组的肉体,是原来的肉体还是不一样的肉体?
Let's go into hi3.c. So again I have some comments up top.
再创建一个文件hi3,c,还是一样,头部有一些注释信息。
应用推荐