We can say that Iser's position is a reconstruction of what Gadamer has, essentially, to say about the merger of horizons.

我们可以说，伊瑟尔的观点,本质上是葛达玛观点的改写，比如说视域的融合。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

As you'll see when we return to Iser after I've said a few things about Hirsch, this, as you'll see, is the fundamental difference between Gadamer and Iser.

正如你们所看到的,当我谈论了赫施的问题之后,又回到了伊瑟尔，这就是葛达玛和伊瑟尔的明显不同。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

You can figure Milton asking in this poem Lycidas if it's true: is it true what the Elder Brother said, ? that virtue is always rewarded and evil punished?

可以看出在《利西达斯》中弥尔顿是在问：,《科玛斯》中哥哥所说的，善有善报恶有恶报是真的么？

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

In other words, Iser is no more an historicist than Gadamer is but insists rather on the mutual exchange of prejudice between the two horizons in question.

换句话说就是，伊瑟尔并不比葛达玛更历史主义,但他相反却坚持在两个有争执的视域中,偏见的互换。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

The next major poem that Milton writes after Comus is Lycidas.

弥尔顿在《科玛斯》之后的重要诗作是《利西达斯》

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选