But then, it seems that property, what counts as property is not natural but conventional defined by the government.

但然后，他的意思似乎是如何界定财产权,不是与生俱来而是约定俗成的，是由政府定义的。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

.. Yes. By Locke's definition, you can say... So maybe by Locke's definition, the Native Americans could have claimed a property right in the land itself.

是的，按照洛克的定义，你可以说。,也许按照洛克的定义，印第安人可以宣称拥有对该土地的财产权。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

Buthere is the conventional aspect of property, it's a further question what counts as property, how it's defined and what counts as taking property, and that's up to the government.

但财产还有约定俗成的一面，就引出了更进一步的问题,什么才算财产，财产如何定义,且何种行为才算掠夺财产，这是由政府决定的。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选