The two passages that I'm about to read juxtapose the viewpoints that I've been trying to evoke in describing Gadamer's position.
我要读的这两篇文章在某些观点上是并行的,我在讲伽达默尔的看法时想激发的就是这些观点。
I want to quote from the beginning of Roland Barthes' essay, which I know I only suggested, but I'm simply going to quote the passage so you don't have to have read it, The Death of the Author.
我想引用罗兰,巴特文章开头的几句话,我只是推荐这篇文章,从中引用几句,所以你们不用事先读,这篇文章就是《作者之死》
They read. And one of the people that was reading this literature was a high school teacher who was teaching mathematics in Basil, Switzerland.
其中一个读过这篇文章的人,是个教高中生的老师,在瑞士的罗勒教数学。
We have the line spectra lying out there in the literature, and people read the literature.
这篇文章也涉及到了线光谱,人们都读过这篇文章。
You're probably a little frustrated because maybe you sort of anticipated what he was going to say, and then you read it and you said, "Gee, he really isn't saying that.
如果你差不多猜出了他要说什么的话,你可能会有点沮丧,如果你读这篇文章,就会说:“哎呀,他不是这个意思。
by Michel de Certeau, which makes this argument in sustained form. I recommend it to you.
作者是米歇尔德赛都,这篇文章有力地证明了这个论点,建议大家读一下。
You can read this and you can learn because it's well-written.
通过读这篇文章,你能学到一些东西,因为这写得很好。
This is what he says in this first passage. He says: If we study speech from several viewpoints simultaneously, the object of linguistics appears to us as a confused mass of heterogeneous and unrelated things.
这也是他在第一篇文章里说的话:,我们同时从几个角度读这篇文章,这时语言学乱的像一锅粥,没有系统毫无关联性。
One of the texts of de Man -also in the book called Allegories of Reading where you'll find also a version of the essay "Semiology and Rhetoric" one of the essays that those who had actually read de Man actually argued about in a persistent fashion is called "The Purloined Ribbon."
德曼的一篇文章,同样在《阅读的寓言》这本书中能找到,在这本书中还能找到“符号学与修辞“的一个版本“,这是一篇读过德曼的人都会,不停争论的文章,它叫“偷窃的缎带“
应用推荐