-
So let's take a look down here at what I'm doing and notice here that this is perhaps more compelling; right?
让我们往下看一下我在做什么,请注意这里这个可能是更引人入胜的，对不？
-
And notice because I have just one line of code inside of each of these branches, what have I clearly omitted?
请注意因为我在每个分支中只有一行代码,显然地我省略了什么？
-
So notice the nesting, I can flow my way through how those tests are actually going to take place.
请注意嵌套，我可以跳过,其中不执行一些语句。
-
As I read, pay attention to the degree to which he's constantly talking about language and about the way in which he himself is inserted into language.
听了我读的这段话，请注意,他不断说到语言,以及他自己对语言研究和注意的程度。
-
For those of you who don't realize it, it's now about 12:00 in the evening tomorrow in Beijing Yeah, so anyway, I'll probably fall asleep by about 10:30.
对那些没有注意到的人，请于明晚12点左右联系我,不管怎么说，我会在10点半左右睡觉。
-
The final piece of advice, this is very important so please pay attention to this, which is, I ask you not to talk to your neighbors during lecture.
最后一点建议,很重要,请注意听好,我要求你们,上课的时候,请不要和你的周围的同学说话
-
And I shouldn't just say he here of course, I mean this is he or she but if I get that wrong going on, please forgive me for it.
我不应该只说他,应该说他或她,如果我以后又没注意,请大家多多包涵
-
But notice that that label,personal identity, the problem of personal identity, seems to have built into it the assumption that whatever it is that's me is going to be a person.
但请注意这个标签，个人认同感，个人认同感的问题，似乎是建立在这样一个假设上,无论我是什么，都将是一个人。
-
In fact, as a little helper, notice what it's sort of automatically including for me: What's this thing here?
事实上，作为一个帮助程序，请注意,它为我自动分类：这个是什么东西？
-
PROFESSOR 2: I just want to maybe mention that in some of the reading, you'll see terms like object equality and value equality, instead of shallow equality and deep equality.
教授2：我就是想提醒下,大家阅读的时候请注意，你们会看到对象相等和值相等,而不是浅意义相等和深意义相等，教授：好，那么，这个对象。
-
And the last piece I want you to see here, and then I'll let you go is, notice now how that encapsulation, that binding things together has really helped me.
我想要的那么干净，最后一点要给大家讲的是，也就是下课前讲的一点，就是请注意这里是怎么封装的,也就是把东西绑定在一起。
-
Well, notice again, on each level of the tree, when I actually do the merging, so this remember, is when I wrote down just the numbers when I bottomed out with the list of size 1.
请注意，在这棵树中的每一层，我真正做合并时，就将每个大小为1的列表中的,数字写下来。
-
Done. All right? The basic, that primary search, because it looks at the first element, says it's smaller than everything else, I'm done.
以及其他的元素，检索完成，让我试试二分法呢？,可能会用更长的时间，请注意这里的输出。
-
But notice now I'm getting a little fancier.
但请注意现在我变得有点兴趣了。
-
Some of which I built: cmp, init, str. And there, notice, are the internal definitions And in fact I should've said, we often call those things fields.
就是给我一个所有东西的列表：,所有的方法，与这个类关联的，有一些是我写的：,还有这里，请注意，是一些内部的定义。
-
It could also say, what are the methods associated with the string, 1. I'm sure you can quickly graph it, but notice they aren't the same.
我们也可以说，与字符串1相关联的方法有哪些？,我相信你们可以很快的求出来，但是请注意这跟前面的。
-
OK. So. Why did I do it? It's a simple example, I agree, but notice what I just did. It allowed me to highlight, is the code doing the right thing?
这是一个简单的例子，我同意，但是请注意我刚才是怎么做的,我通过它想要强调，代码是做了正确的？
-
x Inside of that structure, create a variable name x, and a value associated with it.
创建了一个变量名为，然后给它赋值，请注意我也在这边做的操作。
-
But notice the previous line, where I am computing volatility.
但是请注意前面这个语句，我用这个语句计算了浮动值。
-
All right. Notice what I did. OK.
好，请注意刚才我所做的。
-
But notice what I have to do here.
请注意我在这里所做的。
-
So notice what I have up there now.
请注意我这里代码的颜色。
-
So notice what I'm going to do.
请注意我要去做的操作。
-
But notice what I did.
但是请注意刚才我的步骤。
-
If I go back to that code from a moment ago, and I just rerun math3, notice how many places printed after the decimal point -- two?
如果刚才我回到那段代码中去，我们回到math3，请注意在小数点后面,会打印几位数呢--两位？
-
Yeah, I've still got a binding for z and I'm giving it the same test, but notice now I've got the two same commands but they have different indentation.
对，我还是对z进行了绑定,我还是要对它进行同样的测试，但是请注意现在我有了两个同样的命令,但是它们有不同的缩进。
-
printf Well, notice I'm calling print F with percent C, and then I'm printing out each of these letters one at a time.
好的，请注意我用%c来调用，然后我打印出一个一个打印出这些字符。
-
Now, for all that, notice, I presume that Ivan Ilyich had a will.
即便如此，请注意我假设Ivan，Ilyich设有遗嘱。
-
And you might say, wait a minute, isn't that a string, and the answer's no, I didn't say it's a string by putting quotes around it And notice how the machine responds differently to it.
你会想，等等，这不是个字符串么？,答案是否定的，我没用引号包围它就意味着它不是字符串,请注意计算机对它给出了不同的反应。
-
This time, I've done the same thing but there's a little curiosity here.
这次，我还是做同样的事情，但是不同的是,请大家把注意力集中到这。
应用推荐