-
OK. What happens if you actually have something that's both syntactically correct, and appears to have correct static semantics, and you run it?
好，当你的代码语法,没错误，并且也有正确的静态语义，你去运行它的时候会发生什么呢？
-
or totally grammatically correct or might sound awkward,
也不用在乎语法是否完全正确，或者听起来是否别扭，
-
We respond to our kids like we respond to each other based on the message that's conveyed, not the grammaticality of the utterances.
我们对孩子的反应和对他人的反应一样,都是基于表达的信息内容,而不是表达的语法正确性
-
Because it said you didn't even take the time to make sure the syntax is correct.
因为那意味着你们根本没有花时间,去检查语法是否正确。
-
So it's an address, it's a pointer, address pointer, synonyms for now, so it's the address of a char so this makes sense because s1 is also the address of a char so if I wanted to make a copy of that address this is absolutely the right syntax.
是一个地址，是一个指针，地址指针，也就是，char型数据的地址,这是有意义的，因为s1也是一个char型数据的地址,所以如果我想要复制那个地址,这个绝对是正确的语法。
-
It finds one syntax error at a time, so you have to be a little patient to do it, but you can check that the syntax is right.
它一次会找到一个语法错误，所以你们必须要有点耐心，但是你们可以检查出语法是否正确。
-
It's not since syntactically correct, right?
因此这并不是语法正确的对不对？
应用推荐