-
The syntax is OK in the sense of, it is an operand, an operator, an operand, so syntactically it's OK.
这里的语法应该是好的，有个运算对象，一个运算符，另外一个运算对象，因此语法上是没错的。
-
so their grammar is very ingrained in Spanish, which is different than English.
他们的语法是基于西班牙语的，与英语截然不同。
-
De Man's point is a question is both rhetorical and grammatical, and the one cannot be reduced to the other. Both readings are available.
德曼想指出的是，一个问句既是修辞型问句又是语法型问句，那么一个不能变成另一个，两种理解都有效。
-
I just want to remind you, if I wanted to, for example, type in an expression like that, notice the syntactical form, it's an expression, a number, followed by an operand, followed by another expression.
我想要提醒下大家，如果你想要，例如，输入一个这样的表达式，注意语法形式，这是个表达式，一个数字，后面是一个运算对象，后面是另外一个表达式。
-
- Parses through them, which means to read through this-- what are really just text files, top to bottom, left to right.
从语法上分析它们，这就是说要阅读它-,实际上是一个文本文件，从上到下，从左到右。
-
So, if you want to estimate how many grammatical sentences under twenty words in English, the answer is, "A lot."
如果你想估计一下,用二十个英文单词,可以组成多少个符合语法的句子,答案会是,"很多"
-
and you've received assignments that are just riddled with grammatical mistakes,
而你又收到了满是语法错误的作业，
-
and it's all grammar, grammar, grammar.
全是语法、语法、语法。
-
It doesn't arbitrarily stop anywhere because rhetoric and grammar remain irreducible. We have to keep thinking of them as being uncooperative with each other.
它不会武断地停到任何一个地方,因为修辞和语法是不可削减的，我们必须,一直把它们看成是相互不合作的。
-
He's saying they're doing great work but they forget this one little thing: you cannot reconcile rhetoric and grammar.
他说的是，他们做得非常好,但是他们忘记了一个小问题，修辞和语法是不可能和解的。
-
Right? That would be an entirely different matter, wouldn't it, because you would have absolutely no idea whether the question was rhetorical or grammatical, right?
对吧，那将会是一个完全不同的情况，难道不是吗，因为你就会完全不知道,这个问句是修辞型的还是语法型的，对吧？
-
And then there are some stupid syntax like curly braces and semicolons that initially are kind of annoying because you have to remember where all this junk goes.
还有一些像大括号和,分号之类的愚蠢语法,最初是很讨厌的,因为你需要记得它得放到哪里。
-
yeah I run this, yeah, I have a syntax error, yes indeed, because I forgot to comment that one out, all right, and cue, we'll try it again.
运行下，一个语法错误，确实是，因为我忘了把这里注释上了，好，让我们再来试试。
-
So this is the last new piece of syntax to be honest for a while.
老实说，暂时这是最后一个新语法。
-
So the second common thing that we saw was a syntax like this.
我们看到的第二个通常的东西是一个这样的语法。
-
Later in the term, we'll see why we have this syntax and why it wasn't just a totally arbitrary Python brain-dead decision by the designers of Python, and many languages before Python, but in fact is a pretty sensible thing.
这个学期的晚些时候,我们会去学学我们学这些语法的原因,以及这些语法其实并不是,和以前其他语言的设计者，一拍脑子做出的决定，实际上制定这些语法其实是相当明智的。
-
And even though the syntax, the characters you are about to see on the screen and in programs today onward is a little more arcane, it's a little uglier looking, you've got semicolons and parentheses and fairly arcane syntax, realize that at the end of the day these are just arbitrary human conventions, the ideas are identical to this thing here.
可能你在屏幕上，编程中见识到的,语法，字符看起来非常晦涩难懂,甚至可以说是丑陋，像什么分号啊,括号啊等等，还有一些难七八糟的语法，但是到了最后，你会发现,这些都不过是一些人为约定而已，而蕴含在里面的编程思想跟这个例子并无二致。
-
B In fact, it's even a question whether A is A, but it's certainly not B, right? This much we know. In the grammatical sense there is no sort of mystification about the metaphor.
实际上，人们甚至对A是不是A都有疑问，但肯定不是，是吧，我们都知道这点，而从语法的角度来看,并没有像暗喻一样的神秘化。
-
So, and this is where, again, things get sort of unnecessarily complicated just because of the syntax.
那么，这是哪里，因为这些语法,东西有点难懂。
-
Syntax basically says, what are the legal expressions in this language?
语法也就是说，这个语言的合理表示是什么？
-
In the grammatical sense, this word is the means or principal of predication whereby we say one thing is another thing: the mare is the female of the horse, for example.
从语法的角度来看，is这个词是,我们声明一个东西是另一个东西的方式或者？委托：,例如说，母马是马中的雌性。
-
We respond to our kids like we respond to each other based on the message that's conveyed, not the grammaticality of the utterances.
我们对孩子的反应和对他人的反应一样,都是基于表达的信息内容,而不是表达的语法正确性
-
So, grammar can be restricted but still give rise to an infinity of possible sentences.
所以,语法是有些局限,但仍然能产生无限可能的句子
-
So what's syntax?
那么什么是语法呢？
-
Now, the syntactic rules are complicated.
语法规则是复杂的
-
Finally, there is syntax.
最后是语法
-
Finally, syntax.
最后一个成分是语法
-
Pseudocode is kind of an English-like syntax that's just a useful way of expressing yourself fairly succinctly, fairly computer-like but without having to worry about stupid details like whether it's Java or C or whatever.
伪码是一种类似英语的语法,可以简洁地,表达自己的意思，它与电脑类似,但是你不用担心那些愚蠢的细节,比如Java，C语言或者其他什么语言。
-
The difference with the do while loop, as the syntax kind of suggests, is that this construct is going to do something no matter what.
作为建议的语法，do，while循环的不同之处,是这个结构不管怎么样,它会做一些事情。
-
So conceptually the key difference here, besides the syntax looking slightly different, it just means that if you want a chunk of code to execute no matter what initially, ; you can use the do while loop; if you want to check a condition first, you can use the while loop.
所以概念上，则关键的区别是，除了语法看起来有点不同，它的意思是如果你想要一段代码,最初无论如何都要执行，你就可以用do，while循环;,如果你想要先检查条件，你可以用while循环。
应用推荐