Both Guillory and Angus Fletcher are examining the troubled relation of Milton to one of his favorite poets.
无论是古伊洛还是安格斯弗莱彻,他们都在研究弥尔顿最爱的一首诗中和他相关的问题。
Pound goes to work on Yeats, goes to work on his poetry and helps modernize him, although I think in lots of ways the influence went just as much the other way.
庞德转而研究叶芝和他的诗,并帮助他往现代主义转变,尽管我认为在很多方面,是叶芝影响了庞德。
What does Milton do -- this is what I see as our project, our interpretive project, as we approach this poem -what does Milton do to get himself unstuck from this seat of anxious anticipation? That's the project.
他到底做了什么-在我看来这是我们要研究的项目,我们研究这首诗时需要解释清的项目,他做了什么使自己腹背受控,从而受挫于令人焦虑的期望?,这是我们要研究的。
Here, as elsewhere in Yeats' poetry, it's not essential for you to be able to pursue his occult learning and decode his symbols in order to read his poetry.
这首诗还有他的其他诗里,研究他的神秘主义学习,和解释这些象征对读他的诗,来说不是很重要。
One is the chapter on Comus in a book by John Guillory called Poetic Authority, and the other is the entire book by Angus Fletcher on Milton's Comus, titled The Transcendental Mask.
一个是约翰古伊洛写的关于Comus的一个章节,叫诗的威信,另一个是安格斯弗莱彻写的一本研究弥尔顿的Comus的书,叫《超凡的》
应用推荐