-
After all, this argument really did show the immortality of the soul, why would he need to offer a further argument?
毕竟如果这个论证真正的,解释了灵魂的不朽，他为何还要提出进一步的论证呢？
-
And here I mean not merely, well, logically speaking, you know, of course you can reject any premise of any argument.
这里我并不只是指,从逻辑上讲,你当然可以,反驳这个论证的每一个前提
-
So, someone had the idea of going beyond the intuitive notion that Aristotle mentioned and moving to something that is calculable.
就是说有人,超越了亚里士多德,将这种观点提升至可计算论证的层次
-
If you did that, on some level, I think, you were absolutely right, even though you were utterly misconstruing the logic of the argument.
如果你那么做了，我认为在某种程度上你们是绝对正确的,即使你们完全理解错了这论证里面的逻辑。
-
But what about the big claim, the premise, the big idea underlying the libertarian argument?
但自由主义的论证中，最根本的主张,其前提和基础又如何呢？
-
It's a fascinating argument, but the bottom line is this.
这是一个吸引人的论证，但是底线是。
-
I've gone over this argument at such length because, I hope it's clear, I think it's a pretty interesting argument.
我用这么长时间研究这个论证,我希望是清楚的，是因为这是个很有意思的论证。
-
The great philosophers had arguments that they were putting forward to try to persuade us of the truths of their positions.
这些伟大的哲学家们做出了论证,来使我们相信,他们观点的正确性
-
The soul, we now say, based on the argument from recollection, the soul is one of our prior parts.
我们现在讲灵魂,在源于记忆的论证的基础上，灵魂是我们之前的一部分。
-
You might put it this way as sort of the easiest version of this kind of argument, for our purposes.
你也可以把它当作,这种论证的最简解释方式,以便于理解
-
Maybe the better arguments for the soul focus not on the everyday but on the unusual, on the supernatural.
或许更好支持灵魂存在的论证应着眼于,不寻常的,超自然的现象,而非日常所见
-
But, it doesn't guarantee it, because absent further argumentation, there's no guarantee that the soul survives the death of the body.
但这不能保证,由于缺乏进一步的论证,我们无法保证,在肉体死亡后灵魂仍然存活
-
When I talked about arguments for the existence of a soul, I said, "Look, here's one possible argument.
当我谈论证明灵魂,存在的论证时,我说过,"这里有个可能的论证
-
All that Simmias needs to cause problems for Socrates' argument is the claim that harmony is invisible and harmony can be destroyed.
西米亚斯为苏格拉底的论证,带来问题的只需要是,和声是无形的,但是可以毁灭。
-
It's an argument that doesn't seem to have any empirical premises; it works from purely armchair philosophical reflection.
这是一个没有任何经验前提的论证,它完全只是躺在椅子上对哲学的思考得出
-
And the way you show respect for a philosopher is by taking those arguments seriously and asking yourself, do they work or not?
因此对一位哲学家表示尊敬的方式应该是,认真地对待他们的论证,并且问你自己,那些论证是否说的通
-
But I think this is fairly faithful to the kind of argument he means to put forward.
但是我认为这样相当忠实于,他想要推进的论证。
-
Remember the argument from recycling says when you build something, you build it out of parts.
源于轮回的论证是说,你建造某种东西的时候，你通过许多的部分建造。
-
But before we do, I wanna make a last couple of comments about the argument we were considering at the end of last class.
但是在这之前，我想要对上堂课结束之前,我们考虑的那些论证,进行最后的点评。
-
Maybe it's an invitation to the reader to recognize that there is a better argument here than even the characters in the drama have noticed.
也许是要邀请读者,来辨别出,还有更好的论证,甚至连剧本里的人都注意到了。
-
That's the argument I put up on the board at the end of last class.
这是上节课结束时,我在黑板上所写的论证
-
We've been looking at Plato's arguments for the immortality of the soul, and so far, I have to say I haven't found them very compelling arguments.
我们研究了柏拉图关于,灵魂不朽的论证，到目前为止，我要说的是,我发现这些论证并不是很有说服力。
-
For precisely the reasons that are pointed to by the rest of the argument.
这个论证的其余部分,会为我们指出切确的原因
-
Maybe this argument from simplicity isn't really as good as it needs to be.
可能源于简单的论证,并不是需要那么完美。
-
It's a way to avoid the argument; although, for what it's worth, I should mention I don't myself believe that it's false that we have free will.
这是回避这条论证的一种方法,尽管这条论证有它自身的价值,应该说,我个人认为,人有自由意志,并没有错
-
First of all, as I just noted, the argument needs premise number one.
首先,像我刚才提到的,这个论证的成立需要前提一
-
The argument from essential properties which will be introduced to you later.
一会儿将给你们介绍,源于基本属性的论证。
-
God's forbidding of the fruit removes from Adam and Eve any capacity for choosing and deciding, and you can see Milton worrying in Areopagitica about the uneasy relationship of his own argument to this central text in divine scripture.
上帝对果实的禁止抽离了亚当和夏娃选择和决定的,能力，你会看到弥尔顿在《论出版自由》中的焦急,因为这不安的关系,他的论证和虔诚的圣典中的中心段落。
-
This is a devastating and, I think, brilliant argument.
我认为这是压倒性的，极其精彩的论证。
应用推荐