And Pauli says no two electrons in a given system can have the entire set of quantum numbers identical.

而泡利认为在一个给定的系统内,没有两个电子有完全相同的量子数。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

Constant. Ooh, constant says, no matter what the length of the list is, I'm going to take the same amount of time.

这个算法用的时间是相同的，我不这么认为，如果我们创建一个十倍于以前大小的数组。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

For example, I might believe that it's equally likely that they choose Left and Right, is that right?

举个例子吧,我可能认为他选择,左和右的可能性是相同的,对吗

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

For a first pass, let's just say for condensed systems we can go with it.

对于第一步，在凝聚体系中我们可以这样认为二者是相同的。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

Well, you might think it's an empirical question, and in fact I am inclined to think it's an empirical question, varying from person to person.

你可能觉得这是个实证问题，我也倾向于认为它是实证问题，各人的情况各不相同。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Because the two are not identical despite massive amounts of scholarship that confuses this issue: thinks holy means pure, thinks common means impure, and it just doesn't: these are different binary oppositions. The two are not identical.

因为这俩并不完全相同,还是会有很多学者会弄混它们：,认为神圣的就是纯洁的，普通的就是不纯洁的，实则不然：,它们是不同的相对关系，它们并不完全相同。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

And we know that Down does best if I think it was equally likely that the person was going to choose Left and Right.

我们还知道如果我们认为对手,选左或者是右的可能性相同的情况下,下是此情况下最好的策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So that would actually be another method I could put in.

好我认为它是在做比较,看看是不是相同的？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

The causal paths that result in death may start different, but I presume that they converge and you end up having a set of events take place.

不同的手段导致死亡的方式不同,但是我认为有一点是相同的,你的死亡伴随着这一系列的事情发生

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I know this might be changing the game a little bit, but if you ever expected to play the same game with the partner you have more.

我知道这可能会稍微改变点这个博弈,但是如果你认为以后你还会,和你的对手进行相同博弈

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Let's look at my payoffs from choosing these three options Up, Middle, and Down, if I think it's equally likely that my opponent will choose Left and Right.

我们来看一下我从上中下这三个策略中,分别能获得什么样的收益,如果我认为我对手,选择左或右的可能性相同

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

What about my expected payoff from choosing Middle against , so in this case where I think it's equally likely that my opponents going to choose Left or Right?

那我在情况下,选中的预期收益是什么呢,在此情况下我依然认为,对手选左选右的可能性相同

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So what we're going to look at is the expected payoff of Up versus, let me call it a : a being equally likely that my opponent chooses Left and Right.

所以接下来我们看看在我认为对手,选择左右的可能性相同下的预期收益,我们把它称为

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

The key to personal identity not the only thing a soul theorist can say but the natural thing for a soul theorist to say the key to personal identity is having the very same soul.

人格同一性的关键,不仅是灵魂理论家会说,而且他们是很自然地认为,人格同一性的关键,是有相同的灵魂。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So, for example suppose now, just to make life a little bit more interesting, suppose that the voters were actually two rows and just allow me the suspension of disbelief that these rows have the same number of people in them, I know they don't really.

例如,假设现在,为了更有趣点,假设选民是两排人,且允许我认为,这两排人数相同,我知道他们实际上是不同的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Offering a realistic scenario, a realistic description of such a person--Ivan Ilyich-- doesn't give us any reason to think that most of us or many of us are in his situation.

提供一个比较真实的场景，给出一个对Ivan，Ilyich这种人比较现实的描述-,并不足够给我们理由来认为,我们中大部分就会和他的情况相同。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选