Respect for others' beliefs and freedom of expression are sometimes in tension with critiquing those same beliefs.
对他人观点的尊重,言论的自由,有时会和批判他人观点产生冲突。
so it's really nice and a good environment, a lot of discussions and you get to,
所以我们的环境非常好,言论也很自由,
And you think that's because our constitution that protects it? I mean do you think... I think to a very considerable extent, it is.
你觉得这要归功于我们宪法,对言论自由的保护?还是说。,我觉得在一定程度上是的。
He doesn't make the claim about the general utility of freedom or unlimited speech.
他并未主张自由的,一般实用或是无限言论;
Why can't you, we live in a democratic society with freedom of speech.
我们生活在个有言论自由的民主社会。
If we're arguing about hate speech, we could talk about the balance between the rights of the freedom of speech versus the right to a certain quality of education free of harassment and humiliation.
如果我们围线仇恨言论来争辩,我们就会谈到如何平衡,言论自由的权利,与接受高等教育,不受骚扰和羞辱的权利。
So then it's not broader in the US than it is in the UK.
也就是说那时美国的言论没有英国自由。
The pressure points come when the issues are so close to the bone that a variety of people don't feel that they had the luxury to do that, that their interests, their commitments are threatened.
有时也有一些压力,这时话题通常比较敏感,许多人,觉得言论自由成为了一种奢侈品,他们的兴趣和信仰都受到了威胁。
Absolutely. The reason why we have a right to free speech is because we have a right to own ourselves, to exercise our voice in any way that we choose.
当然,我们之所以享有言论自由,是因为我们是自己的主人,有权用任何方式表达自己的观点。
Is a healthy society ? one that is literally open to every point of view, ? freedom of speech is naturally a cherished good, ? is it the supreme good?
健全的社会,基本上就是对各种观点持开放态度吗,言论自由本质上就是好的,或它是最好?
I think we genuinely have a free speech tradition.
我们真的有一种言论自由的传统。
But this reading of the Apology as you might say is a kind of brief for freedom of expression and a warning against the dangers of censorship and persecution.
但阅读《苏格拉底自辩篇》,你可能会说,好似一种对言论自由的概述,还有对审查,及迫害危机的警告。
His in other words seems to be a highly personal in many ways highly individual quest for self perfection and not a doctrine about the value of freedom of speech in general.
换言之,他崇高的个人,从许多层面来看,是他崇高的个人,追求本身完美,而非关一般,言论自由价值的学说。
My first book was on the trial of John Peter Zenger, 5 which was the first famous case in America in 1735 relating to freedom of speech.
我首本书写的就是John,Peter,Zenger审判,这个案例在1785年的美国家喻户晓5,是言论自由方面的第一个例子。
How far should freedom of speech and that is to say speech that borders on, even verges into, civic impiety, ? how far should such speech be tolerated?
言论自由的界限,确切的说是临界言论,甚至是跨界谈到公民渎神的言论,这类言论的容忍界限为何?
We will debate equality and inequality, affirmative action, free speech versus hate speech, same-sex marriage, military conscription, a range of practical questions.
我们将讨论平等与不平等,平权行动,自由言论与攻击性言论,同性婚姻,兵役制等一系列现实问题。
How are we to understand this case ? about toleration and freedom of speech?
我们如何了解这件,关于容忍与言论自由的范例?
For me, that's the context for all of this.
对我来说,这就是美国言论自由的背景。
But how did Plato intend this dialogue to be understood? Note that Socrates never defends himself by reference to the doctrine of unlimited free speech.
但柏拉图到底想要这场辩证,如何被理解呢?请注意,苏格拉底的自辩从未援引,无限自由言论学说。
应用推荐