• This is the result, this is the fruit, of the hermeneutic engagement between horizons that results in meaning.

    这是阐释学的结果,它的产物,不同视域会合的阐释学能得到文章的含义。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • We can say that Iser's position is a reconstruction of what Gadamer has, essentially, to say about the merger of horizons.

    我们可以说,伊瑟尔的观点,本质上是葛达玛观点的改写,比如说视域的融合。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • It's not your horizon; it's not my horizon; it's that effective history which takes place when our horizons merge.

    这不是你的视域,也不是我的视域;,而是我们的视域融合时产生的有效历史。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • In other words, Iser is no more an historicist than Gadamer is but insists rather on the mutual exchange of prejudice between the two horizons in question.

    换句话说就是,伊瑟尔并不比葛达玛更历史主义,但他相反却坚持在两个有争执的视域中,偏见的互换。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • We just take it for granted that what we're reading is completely within our own horizon and we don't make any effort at all to understand that which is fundamentally or at least in some ways different.

    我们想当然地认为,我们读的东西都在自己的视域之中,并不必花费什么精力,去理解那些基本上不同或有些不同的东西。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • It's neither in the text nor in the reader but the result of the negotiation back and forth between the text and the reader, he says, that sort of brings the literary work into existence in a virtual space.

    它不在文本中,也不在读者的视域中,而在反复阅读文本和读者的视域之中,他说,那样会把文学作品,放到一个虚拟的空间中去。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定