So we try to remember to say "Wimsatt and Beardsley" even though it is Wimsatt who taught at Yale.

所以我们总说“文萨特和比尔兹利“,尽管在耶鲁教书的只有文萨特。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Again it's Wimsatt and Beardsley, but I already explained how that is.

再次来看文萨特和比尔利兹的观点，尽管我已经说过了。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

"Where there is leisure for fiction, there is little grief."

的萨特和长有羊蹄的农牧神“，“既有闲心虚造，就无多少悲痛“

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

He's interested in the way in which a reader can come to terms with a meaning conveyed by a text, and that much, as I say, despite the profoundly different nature of their projects, Wimsatt and Gadamer have in common.

他只关注读者如何明白,文章的意思，而这也就是，我所说的，文萨特和葛达玛的共同之处，即是他俩在某些领域有本质上的差别。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

This much, by the way, Wimsatt has in common with Gadamer, because Gadamer doesn't talk much about authors either, and Gadamer is interested in what he calls meaning, the subject matter, die Sache. Right? He's not interested in your sort of expression of that meaning or my expression of that meaning.

顺便说一句，文萨特和葛达玛很大相同之处就在于，葛达玛也不太强调作者的作用，而是对文章的含义，主题感兴趣，不是吗？，他不关注作品在用,你的还是我的表达方式来表现内涵。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选