• Alex is going to get all the left wing votes, but there aren't enough left wing votes here, right?

    亚历克斯将获得他左边左派的选票,但不是所有的左派选票,对吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • I'm going to get all the people at position 1 and half the people at position 2 for a total of 15.

    我会获得所有立场1的选票,和立场2一半的选票,就是15%

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So what's my--somebody can shout this out-- what's my share of the vote if I choose 1 and the other candidate chooses 1?

    有人能说一下吗,如果我们都选择立场1时,我能获得多少选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • 5% of the votes which is actually lower, so it's clear that 3 doesn't dominate 2.

    我会少获得5%而得到85%的选票,所以说立场3不优于立场2

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • In the former case if I choose 1 against 4, how many votes do I get?

    如果我选立场1对手选立场4,我会获得多少选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • If I choose 1 against 3, what share of the vote do I get?

    如果我选立场1,对手选立场3,我能获得多少选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • It means that choosing position 2 always gives me a higher share of the vote than choosing position 1, no matter where the other candidate positions herself.

    意味着选择立场2,会比选择立场1,获得更多的选票,无论另一个候选人如何选择

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • But you'll see that very clearly that Steven's right: that choosing 2 will always get me 5% more of the votes than choosing 1 from here on down.

    你会发现斯蒂文说的很对,从这里开始,选立场2总会比,选立场1多获得5%选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Exactly, so ignoring these first two positions which were a bit weird, choosing 2 always gave me 5% more votes than choosing 1, regardless of what the other person chooses.

    完全正确,所以忽略前两个立场,因为前两个立场有点古怪,我们选立场2总比1多获得5%的选票,无论对手如何选择

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So, in particular, let's start working out what share of the votes you'd get if you chose position 1 or position 2, against different positions the other guy can choose.

    先来看看如果你选择立场1和2,在你对手选择不同立场时,你分别能获得多少选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Beatrice is going to get all of these right wing votes.

    比阿特丽斯将获得所有的右派选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • What's the payoff from choosing 2 against 4?

    对手选4我选2,我能获得多少选票

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Beatrice is also going to get one and a half of the votes in the middle, so this vote and half the Pierson guy's vote and, I've forgotten your name already, again?

    比阿特丽斯同时会获得,中间一个半的选票,这个选票和皮尔逊学院小伙子选票的一半,我忘了你的名字了,请重复一下

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • The moderate right wing votes she's going to split with Claire Elise, and jean's going to have all the left wing votes, extreme and moderate, and so from Stacy's point of view this is a double bad.

    温和的右派选票会被她,和克莱尔·伊莉斯分享,吉恩将会获得所有的左派选票,极端的和温和的,因此从斯泰西的角度看这是加倍的差

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • From here on down, if I bothered to do it, we'd find that choosing 3 always gets me 5% more of the vote than I would have had from choosing 2, against any of these higher numbers.

    如果我不怕麻烦 我能一直这么写下去,我们发现选择立场3总是比选择立场2,使我多获得5%的选票,在对手选更靠后的立场的情况下

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Claire Elise is going to get her own vote plus 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8 votes and Beatrice is getting 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, how did I end up with eight, I thought I had an odd number. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 there must have been an odd number before.

    克莱尔·伊莉斯将获得自己的选票加上,12345678 8张选票,而比阿特丽斯获得1234567,我怎么数出8个来的,我想应该是个奇数,1234567,之前也应该是个奇数

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定