The Crito, on the other hand, is a conversation between Socrates and a single individual, only one person.
另一方面来说,《克里托篇》则是一场,介于苏格拉底与单一个体之间的对话,就只有一人。
The particular dialogue that we're going to reading,the Phaedo, is set at the death scene of Socrates.
我们要学习的这篇对话,斐多篇,就将场景设定在苏格拉底临死前的一幕
That's the way Socrates begins this dialogue, or that's the way Plato has Socrates begin it.
那是苏格拉底开始这场对话的方式,或说是柏拉图让苏格拉底开始的方式。
And you see this, going back to Socrates, there's a dialogue, the Gorgias, in which one of Socrates' friends, Callicles, tries to talk him out of philosophizing.
追溯到苏格拉底时代,就有这样一段对话,在《高尔吉亚篇》中,苏格拉底的一位朋友,卡里克利斯,试图说服苏格拉底放弃哲学思考。
Yeah, this is not a bad time for me to remind you that in one of Plato's dialogues, Socrates says the Greeks sit like frogs around a pond and that pond is the Aegean Sea.
下面引用一下,柏拉图记录的一段对话,苏格拉底说希腊地形,就像一群青蛙围着一个池塘,而那池塘就是爱琴海
Scholars distinguish between the early Platonic dialogues, the so-called Socratic dialogues, where the thought is, those are the views of Socrates, the actual historical figure.
学者们是如此鉴别的,柏拉图早期对话作品,即,在所谓的苏格拉底的对话中,主角苏格拉底的观点,与历史上那个真实的苏格拉底的思想吻合
At the very beginning of the dialogue, Glaucon we see Socrates and his friend Glaucon.
在对话的一开始,我们读到苏格拉底和他的朋友。
And then there's the late dialogues, where even though Socrates appears, most scholars believe those are probably not the views that the historical Socrates actually believed.
而就柏拉图的晚期对话作品而言,尽管苏格拉底也频频出场,大多数学者认为,那些观点很可能,并不是真实的苏格拉底所持有的
Crito is named for a friend and disciple of Socrates who at the outset of the dialogue is sitting as a watchful guardian over his mentor.
克里托篇》的命名源自,苏格拉底的一名朋友及信徒,在对话之初,就诚心守护着他的这位良师益友。
Note the way Socrates manipulates the dialogue, the conversation.
注意看苏格拉底,操控对话的技巧。
Is that speech for the law, with the laws, really intended for the benefit of Crito, rather than an expression ? of Socrates' deepest opinions about the questions of obligation and obedience?
那场为法律所讲,有关法律的对话,真的是要为克里托排解,而不是苏格拉底,最深层意见的表述,尤其是那些问题攸关义务与服从?
The dialogue ends, of course, with the death scene-- Socrates has been condemned to death by the Athenians, and it ends with his drinking the hemlock, not distressed but rather sort of joyful.
对话在死亡场景中结束,此时苏格拉底已经被雅典人宣判死刑,对话在他喝毒药的时候结束,他并不哀伤,反而有点快乐
Philosophy and certainly Socratic philosophy requires friends, comrades, conversations.
哲学及苏格拉底式的哲学,需要朋友,同伴及对话。
So for our purposes, we don't have to ask ourselves when Socrates in the dialogue says something, is this a view that the dead man Socrates actually would have held or is this simply a view that the dead man Plato put in the mouth of the character Socrates?
所以,出于这门课程的目的,我们无需深究,苏格拉底在对话中的某个观点,到底是属于那个真实的受死之人苏格拉底的,还是属于已故之人柏拉图,通过作品中苏格拉底这个角色所表述的
Although it is easy to remember that later in the dialogue most of their contribution seems to be " of the form of "Yes Socrates, no Socrates," they seem to be rather passive interlocutors.
但很明显地,他们在稍后对话中的,绝大部份贡献似乎是反复的,“Yes,苏格拉底,“、,“No,苏格拉底“,他们是相对被动的对话者。
Adeimantus The two brothers, Glaucon and Adeimantus, whose exchange with Socrates occupies, for the most part, the rest of the dialogue from Book Two onward, the two brothers who, incidentally, are the brothers of Plato.
兄弟檔,Glaucon,和,和苏格拉底的对谈,占据了大部份的对话,从第二部起所有对话,这对兄弟,碰巧是柏拉图的兄弟。
应用推荐