Everyone, according to the logic ofAreopagitica everyone has the potential to assume the inner authority of conscience and self-discipline.
按照《论出版自由》的逻辑,每个人都有,用内在良心的统治和自律的潜力。
Nonetheless, the liberty that subjects enjoy in Hobbes' plan falls in that area that he says the sovereign omits to regulate.
然而,受治者方享受的自由,在霍布斯看来应当是,统治者们未进行管理的那一部分。
When they're through and had reached their peak, their notion of monarchy is something fit for barbarians, but not for Greeks. A free man may not live under a monarchy, and the roots of that, I think, are visible in Homer.
当他们赢得竞争,到达权利的顶峰时,他们所谓的君主制其实更适合于异邦人,而不是希腊人,君主统治下不存在自由人,这个想法的根源可以在《荷马史诗》中找到
Plato thought of democracy as a kind of rule by the many that he associated with the unrestricted freedom to do everything that one likes.
柏拉图将民主,想成是一种由多方所统治,并连结到,不受限制的自由,每个人为所欲为。
If we all have a desire to know, ? doesn't this connote something universal, that all should be free, that all should participate in ruling and being ruled as citizens of a city?
如果我们都有求知欲,这不就意味着一种普遍性吗,即所有的人都应是自由人,所有的公民应参与城市中的统治,与被统治的活动?
应用推荐