Aristotle's claim about naturalness seems to require, as he told us, slavery, the categorical distinction of humanity into masters and slaves.
亚里士多德关于自然演变的主张,似乎包含了奴役,分类地,将人类区别成主与奴。
"For we assert," he says, "nature does nothing in vain and man alone " among the animals has speech.
他说,“因为我们主张自然演变并不无道理,而人类独立于其它动物之外,是因为我们有辩论能力。
The naturalness of slavery is said to follow from the belief that inequality, inequality is the basic rule between human beings.
奴役是自然的演变据其所言,是依寻着不平等的看法,不平等是人类之间最基本的法则。
The polis is natural in the sense that it has grown out of smaller and lesser forms of human association.
城邦是自然的演变,因为它源自,较小单位形式的人类结合。
In the literal opening, he gives what looks like a kind of natural history of the polis.
在本书开始的地方,他给了一种类似,城邦自然演变历史的说法。
There are some who believe that slavery is natural, because ruling and being ruled is a pervasive distinction " that one sees all societies practice."
有些人相信,奴役是自然的演变,因为统治者与被统治者,有着普遍的区别,一方要看顾着整个社会的运作“
But there is a second sense for him and, in some ways, a more important sense in which he says the polis is by nature.
但他还有另一种说法,且就某种程度看来是更重要的说法,他说城邦就是自然演变。
War and the virtues necessary for war are as natural to the city as are the virtues of friendship, trust, and camaraderie that are also necessary.
战争与战争所需的美德,是城市的自然演变,这就像友爱,信任与同志情谊的美德,同等必要一样。
Slavery is natural because we cannot rule ourselves without the restraint of the passions.
奴役是自然的演变,因为我们无法管理我们自己,若无克制激情。
If slavery is natural, and if nature intends to distinguish the slave from the unfree, the free from the unfree, ? how can nature miss the mark?
如果奴役是自然的演变,而自然倾向于,将奴隶从不自由的人中区别出来,将自由从不自由中区别出来,自然如何会偏离正轨?
In what sense, we could ask ourselves and I think you probably will be asking in your sections, ? in what sense is the city by nature?
就何种意义而言,我们能自问,且我想你们也应该,会在你们的时段讨论,就何种意义而言,城市是自然演变的存在?
He seems there to be a kind of anthropologist writing a natural history.
他看似,以人类学家角色写自然演变史。
If the latter, if this hierarchy of intelligence or this hierarchy of the rational is the result of upbringing, ? then how can slavery be defended as natural?
若是后者,即智慧的阶级制度,或说理性的阶级制度,是教养的结果,那奴役如何能以自然演变加以辩护?
I refer to his arguments for the naturalness of slavery.
我所指的论述,即奴役的自然演变。
So what follows, in one sense, that when Aristotle says that man is by nature a political animal and the city is by nature, the city can never be a universal state.
这响应了,亚里士多德所说,人类天生是政治动物,而城市是自然的演变,城市永远不能是一座万国之城。
Aristotle tells us that slavery is natural.
亚里士多德告诉我们奴役是自然的演变。
The city is natural in that it allows human beings to achieve and perfect what he calls their telos.
城市是自然的演变,它让人类可以达成,并完善他们被称为,Telos,的目标。
应用推荐