The Roman Senate, in the late part of the Republic-- yes--started dividing itself into two sort of parties; not official parties, but factions.
罗马元老院,共和国晚期。。。,分裂为两个派;,不是正规党派,只是小派系。
Or Augustus--he had taken the title Augustus by this time, which means "the great"--he himself said, "I transferred the Republic from my power to the dominion of the Senate and the people of Rome."
或者奥古斯都。。。当时他已经使用了这个头衔,意思是“尊崇“,他说,“我已将共和国重还给,元老院及罗马人民统治“
The best example is when Julius Caesar has made himself master of Rome, but he's still behaving as though the republic exists.
于此最好的例子是,当尤利乌斯·恺撒成为罗马的统治者时,他仍然表现得仿佛共和体制仍存在似的
Machiavelli rejected this idea of the empire and harked back, instead, to the model of republican Rome.
马奇亚维利拒绝这种,帝国的想法并回到先前论点,相对地,他回提罗马共和的模式。
What they cared about-- because the Roman Republic by this time was basically a bunch of very important households, wealthy men and their households, and they were the members of the Senate, they were the knight class, they were the people who ran Rome.
他们在乎的是。。。因为当时的罗马共和国,实际上就是一群举足轻重的家户,富有男子及其家户所组成,他们是元老院成员,是骑士阶级,罗马的统治者。
He both replaces and yet reconfigures according to his own lights, elements from both the Christian empire and the Roman republic, to create a new form of political organization distinctly his own.
他不但取代还重新配置,且是根据他自己的想法,原理,有别于基督帝国与罗马共和,创造出一种新型的政治组织,独树一帜。
The Athenians and the Romans," he says, "were free, that is they were free commonwealths, not that any particular man had the liberty to resist his own representative but that his representative had the liberty to resist or invade other people."
霍布斯说,希腊人和罗马人都是自由的,因为他们身在自由的共和国里,他们单独的个体,是没有自由反抗他所选的代表的,但他所选的代表,却有抵抗或是入侵他人的自由“
应用推荐