Suppose f of x, y, z equals k1, that is my equation, s1 and it gives me a solution s1.

假设我的方程是这样，然后给出了一个解。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

But dualism doesn't so much offer the explanation typically as just say, "Well, maybe we'd be better off positing something immaterial."

但是二元论还没有给出,这样的解释,也许我们假设非物质的存在会好一些

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

The second assumption we're going to make which is new is that we're going to assume that candidates cannot choose their position.

我们给出的第二个假设,这个新的假设是,候选人不能选择他们的位置

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So I claim the following.

给出以下的假设。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Really there's no work to be done if I am handed all in sorted order so, you know, There's no work to be done if I'm handed all of the arrays in sorted order so, you know, if I demand that you give me this assumption that the cups are already sorted and then I'll sort them for you, I mean, this is kind of a cyclical argument.

如果杯子是有序排列的,那就没必要再对它进行排序了，同样如果给出的序列本身就是有序的,那也不必再做什么，如果给出这样的假设：,杯子已经有序，但仍需要对其进行排序，这像是个循环的论点。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选