Now that already tells us what we know, which is that the efficiency is going to be something less than zero, right?

我们都知道这个，这结果就是说效率,是负的，对吗？

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

If you want a more technical term for that , and you'll remember this from economics 115 can lead to outcomes that are "Inefficient," that are "Pareto inefficient," But "Suck" Will do for today.

要是想说的更专业店,记不记得在经济学115里面说的,会导致“不充分的”结果,即"帕雷托效率",但我们今天说"糟糕"就可以了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选