And if we were to think about which one of these is better, it turns out that it's the same i in terms of formal charges, so that doesn't help us out.
而如果我们要考虑它们中的哪个更好,结果从形式电荷来看,它们之间没有区别,因此这不能帮我们进行判断。
It's called this just because it's an electron that results when an electron absorbs a photon's worth of energy, so thus it's a photoelectron.
之所以这样称呼是因为,当一个电子吸收,一个光子的能量的结果,因此它是一个光电子。
How likely are all the inputs, are they all equally likely, or are they going to depend on other things? And that may depend on the user, so you can't kind of get at that.
他们大致相同么?,他们依赖于其他事情么?,输入也跟用户有关,因此你没法完全得出结果来。
So, when you divide by the mass to get the acceleration, you get the same answer.
因此,当等号两边除以质量来求加速度时,结果是相同的
So what could be our results of movement in 2 decades?
因此,我们的运动能在20年后获得怎样的结果?
Each person who wants to borrow has to be met by somebody else who wants to lend, so the interest rate that we have in society is the compromise.
想借钱的人必须找到,愿意放贷的人,因此社会中的利率是各方协调的结果
If this was a sickle patient, so they had this gene instead it wouldn't get cut and when I went to look for that presence of that gene on this gel, it would appear as one large segment instead of a large one and a smaller one.
而如果是个镰状红细胞贫血的病人,他们的基因是不会被限制酶切割的,因此他们基因的凝胶电泳结果就不会呈现,一大一小的结果,而只有一个大的片段
We want a relationship in p-V space, not in T-V space. So we're going to have to do something about that. But first, it turns out that now we have this R over Cv.
我们想要p-V空间中的结果,而不是T-V空间中的,因此需要做一些变换,先来看现在的关系,它跟R/Cv有关。
And therefore, they are not systematic about interpreting the results.
预期的正确实验结果,因此,他们就没法做到系统化的去分析结果了。
All right. Second question: or maybe a better way of saying this, and the general format you're likely to see here is, a test involving a variable name, which must be initialized outside of the loop, and which interior to the loop gets changed, so that the test is going to change.
好,第二个问题:,换种更好的方式来说吧,你们通常喜欢的,方式是,这个测试涉及到一个变量名字,变量在循环外已经被初始化,然后循环内部会改变这个变量的值,因此测试结果会改变。
Which is sort of the question we'd immediately like to ask. Instead, I asked why did it produce the result it did. So I'm not asking myself what's wrong? Or how could I make it right?
其实这个问题我们马上就要问,我问了为什么它会返回这样的结果,因此我并没有去在意哪儿错了,或者我该怎么改正它,我在意的是它?
So that means that we don't have to worry about things like wave functions when we're talking about Lewis structures, but because they're so simple to use and because they so often predict the electron configuration of molecules accurately, we end up using them all the time in chemistry, so it's very valuable to know how to draw them correctly and to know how to work with them.
因此这也就意味着我们在讨论路易斯结构的时候,不需要担心波函数之类的东西,但是由于路易斯结构不仅简单易用,而且用它来预测分子的电子排布,经常可以得到非常精确的结果,结果我们在化学中一直都在用它,因此知道如何正确地画出并运用,路易斯结构是非常有价值的。
The highest occupied orbital is now the 2 s orbital, 1 s 2 2 s 1 so we're going to end up with boron 2 plus 1 s 2, 2 s 1, plus the electron coming out of there.
现在最高的被占据轨道是,2,s,轨道,因此结果应该是正二价的硼,再加上一个出射的电子。
p1/p2 So, the nRT's cancel, and we have p1 over p2.
因此nRT相消,结果就是。
Now if you're at the temperature which is b higher than the inversion temperature, in that case here, a over RT is small compared to b, and this is going to turn out to be negative.
T>Tinv】,这时a/bR小于,结果是负数,因此如果温度。
So if this is true do something else, true otherwise test and see if this is true, do something else, as many as I like followed by the end.
因此如果结果为true那么做一些操作,否则的话再看看这个表达式的值是不是,如果是的话做另外一些操作,我想要多少后面就可以跟多少。
应用推荐