• In other words, here is a moment when Levi-Strauss is admitting something about his own work which he is not admitting in his analysis of the Oedipus myth in the essay from Structural Anthropology that you read last time.

    换句话说,在这里,列维承认了,关于自己作品的一些观点,而这些观点,是他在《结构人类学》中的那篇文章中,分析俄狄浦斯神话时所没有承认的,大家上次读过那篇文章。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • Foucault couldn't possibly allow for that because plainly the whole texture of their discourse would be undermined by introducing the notion that it's okay to be a master, and yet Ricoeur feels that these figures dominate modern thought as masters.

    福柯不会认同因为,这样的话他们话语的整个结构就会被破坏,如果引入可以作为大师的观点的话,同时,里克尔感觉这些人支配着现代大师的思想。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • But very nicely, is quite elegent structure this point, Socrates puts toghther the two arguments that we just been rehearsing, the argument from recollection and the argument that came before that, the one that I dubbed the argument from recycling.

    但是这一观点结构非常精妙,苏格拉底把我们刚才演练的,两个论证放在一块,即源于记忆的论证,和在此之前的论证,就是被我称作源于轮回的论证。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • What about the fact that-- We said there's a family of arguments, all of which have the general structure, inference to the best explanation, you need souls in order to explain feature F. Plug in a different feature F and you get a new argument.

    这个事实怎么样,我们说过有一大类观点,它们有一些共同的结构,有关于这个最佳解释的推论,需要用灵魂的概念,来解释功能特征F,代入一个不同的,功能特征就会得到一个新的论点

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定