But we all know do we not that most contemporary political scientists tend to be liberals. Their values are liberal values.
但我们都知道,不是吗?最当代的,政治科学家倾向于是自由主义者,其价值观是自由主义的价值观。
These values are regarded by them as purely subjective again their own value judgment so to speak and not strictly speaking a part of the science of politics.
他们视这些价值观是纯粹主观的,可说是他们自身的价值判断,严格来说,并非,政治科学的一部份。
And there are some philosophers and psychologists who do just that, who claim that free will and responsibility and spiritual value and intrinsic value are all illusions; they're pre-scientific notions that get washed away in modern science or you could try to reconcile them.
一些哲学家和心理学家便是如此,他们认为,自由意志,责任,精神价值,内在价值,这些都是幻象,都是些前科学的概念,应当从现代科学中清洗出去,或者你可以试着将二者调和
It's regarded perhaps by today's political science as too value laden too subjective to speak of statesmanship or statecraft. This too again is a word that carries distinctive and strong ? connotations. Who is a statesman?
因那在今日的政治科学可能包含,太多的价值观,讲领袖风范太过主观或说权术,而也是这个字,它含带了特殊与强烈的内涵,谁是政治家?
应用推荐