So Leviticus supports outright charity for the poor in the form of gleanings. Kind of a welfare system. Deuteronomy has more of a workfare system in mind; they actually never mention the poor.
所以,《利未记》支持以拾遗的方式直接对穷人,进行施舍,有几分像福利制度,《申命记》考虑更多的,则是工作福利制度,事实上它从未提及穷人。
So I have a regular income and I get benefits.
所以我能领份固定的薪水和福利。
In 1992, a study on literacy of United States a particular illiteracy was associated with law incompetence, with poverty, with welfare, with incarceration.
992年,一项关于美国人文化素养的研究,文化素养低下与,低下的生活水平,贫困和社会福利,以及监禁有一定关系。
And if that's the reason, where do those rights come from if not from some idea of the larger welfare or utility or happiness?
如果是那个原因,那这些权利又是从何而来的呢,既然不是为了更大的福利,或曰功利,幸福?
But for Aristotle it is not the liberty of the individual so much as the functioning or functional well-being of the city that is the highest priority.
但对亚里士多德而言,并非个人自由,而是城市运作中,或能运作的福利,才是最要优先考虑的事。
As a result you have a lot of rural Levites who are out of business now, a lot of people who would have officiated at local shrines, and they're out of business: that probably explains the fact that Deuteronomy makes special provision for the Levites and includes them in its... in legislation, sort of social welfare legislation.
因此许多乡下的利未人丢掉了生计,许多在当地主持地方祭祀的人,也丢掉了生计:这也许解释了为什么,申命记中特别为利未人提供了给养,并把它写进了它的立法中,某种社会福利立法。
You can't think that it really could make so much difference in the real world how prices and quantitie and welfare, and profit is going to work out depending on some thought experiment about how I think about my strategy set.
你们很难想象在现实世界里,价格 产量 福利和利润会因为,不同策略集合设定下的思想实验,而产生如此巨大的变化
It occured to me yesterday in my class that maybe someday there won't be social security numbers anymore, and on birth everybody will be given an e-mail address.
我昨天上课的时候想到,或许有天大家出生时,得到的将不是社会福利号码,而是一个邮箱地址。
Public finance relates to the tax and welfare system that we have.
公共财政学涉及,税收和我们的福利体系。
And nobody knows, nobody believes that we can cut spending, right? -Somebody down the road has to pay the bills Somebody down the road has to pay the bills, either by cutting spending, cutting benefits or raising taxes.
而几乎没人相信,政府能够成功节流,不是吗?,-那总得,有人来埋单啊,迟早要有人来为此埋单的,要么精简政府开支,削减福利,要么增税。
They have much stronger welfare states, so to speak.
这么说来他们的福利国家比我们强很多。
He seems, in this way, to anticipate what we might think of as the modern welfare state that public assistance be provided, and the poor, not simply depend on the private goodwill of the others.
如此看来,霍布斯已经预见到了,我们现代社会国家福利制度的出现,穷人不只依靠个人的善意施舍度日,更多的是求助于国家提供的福利保障。
If you want to go live in the state of nature, that's fine, but you can't take anything from the government because by the government's terms, which are the only terms under which you can enter the agreement, say that you have to pay taxes to take those things.
如果你想生活在自然状态下,没问题,但你就不能享受任何政府福利了,因为根据政府组建条款,也是我们同意组建政府的唯一条款,规定只有你缴税了才能享受那些福利。
You can't understand a regime unless you understand so to speak what it stands for what a people stand for what they look up to as well as its again its structure of institutions and rights and privileges.
你无法了解政体,除非你了解它的主张,人民的主张与敬重的政体,还有其机构,权利与福利的结构。
And then from a welfare point of view, from a policy point of view, we're interested about whether this is good for consumers or good for producers or what.
其次,从政治上的福利观点来看,我们还需要研究,这对消费者有利还是对生产者有利
Taking government's services, you are implying that you are consenting to the government taking things from you.
享受政府的福利,就意味着默认,同意政府可以从你那拿去东西。
You can pick out words that are identical. The purpose of the law is to "establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty."
你可以找出完全相同的话,法律的目的是,“树立正义,保障国内的安宁,建立共同的国防,增进全民福利和确保我们自己及我们後代,能安享自由带来的幸福“
I want to start out by mentioning taxes and welfare because, I think, that it's really the most important risk management system already in place.
我想从,税收和福利开始讲起,是因为,我认为,它们实际上是现行的最重要的,风险管理机制。
They have refuse to pay the cost that maintain the health care system, and so in countries like Britain and Canada, t find the same availability of health care like that in the United States.
政府拒绝为民众买单,维持医疗福利,所以在英国和加拿大这样的国家,你找不到,you,don’,同样方便的医疗,可以与美国媲美的。
You have a progressive tax system that takes more money from the wealthier people and you have a welfare system that looks at individual hardship and pays out.
我们有随富有程度加重税负的,累进税制,还有关注个体并进行再分配支出的,福利制度。
Because you would know being a good utilitarian that taking some, a small amount, he'd scarcely going to notice it, but it will make a huge improvement in the lives and in the welfare of those at the bottom.
因为作为一个优秀的功利主义者,你知道,收走一些对他们来说根本无关痛痒的钱,却能大大改善社会底层那些人的生活,增加他们的福利。
应用推荐