So that's not really a... Yeah, in the Palestinian society, there are religious organizations, religious institutions. That is true.
所以这不是真正的问题。,恩,在巴勒斯坦社会,有宗教组织,宗教仪式,这是对的。
And living in New York you can get a very skewed view of what people actually look like.
住在纽约,你会对人们真正长什么样这个问题,产生一种扭曲的观点。
The real issue is to figure out how to build constructs out of this that tackle particular problems, but the fundamental basics of computation are just captured in that set of mechanisms.
坏消息是当然这不是真的,真正的问题是怎么来,构建解决特定的问题的这些结构,但是运算的最基本的东西,仅仅体现在机制集里。
Certainly this is like mid 1990s, we did have the web and the internet but things were slow and it just wasn't really conducive to actually finding things quickly unless you really gave some thought to the problem.
它有些像20世纪90年代,当然我们有网络和互联网,但是做事情很慢,在快速查找东西的时候不是很有效,除非我们对这个问题真正深入思考了。
That's not the end of the story. The question really is, so now we know that, what kind of relations did they have?
这不是重点,真正的问题是,它们之间的关系到底是什么
Secondly, the real problem here is Locke has this view about consent and natural rights.
其次,真正的问题是,洛克对同意和自然权利有这样的看法。
Just like,with the body view,we wanted to say, Being alive is not all it's cracked up to be, the real question is not,am I alive,on the body view?
从肉体理论上,我们想要说,存活一事并非所想,真正的问题是,肉体理论角度看来,我还活着吗?
And so the question is, how many people notice when something happens?
但问题是,真正注意到的有几个人?
Do you think I should neck or not? I shall not enter the kingdom of heaven anyway so I don't see what difference it makes.'" And then she writes back, Mary Brittle: "Dear Sabbath: Light necking is acceptable, but I think your real problem is one of adjustment to the modern world.
你认为我是该做还是不该做,我反正都上不了天堂了,因此,我认为做不做都无所谓,之后她给她回信了,玛丽-巴瑞特,亲爱的萨巴斯,你的做法是可接受的,但我认为,你真正的问题是无法融入现代社会。
What exactly that purgation will entail and why Milton's voice needs to be purged at all I think these questions are really the subject of the entire rest of the poem.
这种净化是很有必要的,弥尔顿的语言为什么需要被完全净化,我认为这个问题才是所有剩余诗歌,真正的主题。
Then, here is what we actually do.
然后,这就是我们真正要解决的问题
But what I really want to talk about is, what's the order of growth here?
但是我这里真正想讲的是,这个问题的增长率是多少?
Then there are some who say the real problem here is the lack of consent, whether the lack of consent to a lottery, to a fair procedure or, Kathleen's idea, lack of consent at the moment of death.
还有人认为,真正的问题在于,没有征得同意,不管是没有征得同意抽签,用公平程序进行,或者是凯思琳所说,没有征得派克的同意杀他。
But since we are only looking at enough of the problem of identity to get to the question that we really want to think about, the nature of personal identity across time, I'm not going to pursue that.
但由于我们只是,通过质的问题,来讨论,我们真正关注的问题,也就是贯穿时间的人格同一性,所以我不讨论那些。
> So this is just a dumb text editor called Nano, dumb in that it's very simple which is nice because it eliminates a lot of the complexities of learning a new tool when really all you wanna do is solve an actual problem.
这是NANO文本编辑器,它很简单,可以消除因学习这个新工具,而带来的许多复杂问题,你真正需要做的就是解决一个实际问题。
let's turn now to the case we really wonder about personal identity.
现在我们说真正讨论的问题,人格同一性。
I'll be content... I won't be completely content... but I'll be at least largely content as long as you've really thought through the arguments on each side of these various issues.
我也是满意的。,即使我不完全满意。,但我至少满意大部分,如果这是你们真正的想法,通过讨论各种问题。
Then there came to be questions about whether the scenes, the stories in the book, actually did happen to him.
于是问题出现了,书里的那些情节和故事是否真正在他身上发生过。
But don't worry about it, it's not, I'm just using it because it's a simpler example than the one I really want to get to, which is knapsack.
但是别担心,我讲这些是因为它比我,真正想讲的问题简单一些,我想讲的是背包问题。
The question is from that special eager realistic perspective we were all familiar with, ? which is the one you really care about?
这个问题针对的是,我们都很熟悉的现实角度的问题,你们真正关心的是哪个人?
So, if you have panic attacks, say, it's true that drugs might make the panic attacks go away, but the panic attacks are actually not your real problem.
比如说,如果你患上了恐慌症,或许药物确实能够治疗恐慌症的症状,但是恐慌症的症状却并不是你真正的问题。
So the real question is how does he himself figure it out between " "I agree to give up my life, give up my property" when he talks about taxes or military conscription for the fact.
所以真正的问题是,他如何能自圆其说以下观点,“我同意放弃我的生命,放弃我的财产“,当他谈到税收制或征兵制时是这样说的。
You're going to see the arguments about space if you take some of the courses that follow on, and again, some nice courses about that. For this course, we're not going to worry about space that much. What we're really going to focus on is time.
在以后的其他课程上你们,会学到一些关于空间的参数,一些讲这个的,很不错的课程,但是在这门课上,我们并不太关心空间问题,我们真正关心的是时间问题。
The real question may not be What does it take to survive?
真正的问题可能不是存活的标准是什么?
应用推荐