PROFESSOR: All right. Good. So we can fully believe what our calculations were now, which is a nice thing to do.
教授:好了,我们现在可以,完全相信我们的计算结果了,多么美妙的一件事。
It's the view that probably most of you believe, but again, it's worth noting that philosophically it can be challenged.
这是一种我们大多数人都相信的观点,但是再一次的,需要指出,从哲学讲它是站不住脚的
We use our minds and our behaviors and our actions continually to try to trick people into believing what's not true.
我们不断地利用我们的心理,行为和动作,去哄骗他人相信那些虚假的事情。
On the other hand, as I said, never trust a programmer to do the right thing so we're going to check it.
另外,如我之前提到的,别相信程序员会一直保持正确,所以我们才要。
We believe that that ethos we call religious pluralism actually is absolutely key to peace in the world.
我们相信我们称作宗教多元主义的社会风气,绝对是世界和平的关键。
Milton has expended, we know, a considerable amount of energy in establishing what he wants us, I am assuming, to believe is the divine authority behind the poem.
我们知道弥尔顿花费了,大量精力阐释他希望我们相信的东西,我设想,他要我们相信在这部诗篇的背后有无上神权的存在。
I'm sure there must have been individual exceptions to everything, but we're talking about the overwhelming reality.
我相信任何事物都会有例外情况,但是我们所讨论的是无可辩驳的事实
I believe that and why do we need to have it as a basic premise of the course, '?" as opposed to change is illusive?"
我相信这一点,但为什么我们需要把它,作为课程的基本前提,而不说'改变是虚幻的“
And,as Chateaubriand said,the writer, "I don't know what we must believe but we must believe in something," and he gets down on his knees and prays.
如作家夏多布里昂所言,"我不知道我们能相信什么,但我们必须相信点什么",然后他屈膝跪下开始祈祷
So, we are now going to do one standard problem where we will convince ourselves we can apply this formulas and predict the future given the present.
我们接下来将去研究一个标准问题,通过这个问题,我们能让自己相信,我们能利用这些式子,根据现状,预测未来
You wrote: I grew up believing that ours was a country that try to stand for good in the world and that upheld the fundamental values that bind us together as a nation.
你写到:,在我的成长过程中,我一直都相信,“,我们的国家,在世界上是一个象征美好的国家,我们主张基本的价值观,这些价值将我们凝结成一个民族。
The state of nature fully continues, in many ways, oddly even in civil society, he says, whenever we have reason to believe that our lives or our properties or ourselves are not secure.
从很多方面来说,自然状态,即使在文明社会里也显得奇怪,不论我们是否有理由相信我们有生活,生命和财产财产安全的保障。
We give lip service to the claim that we're going to die, but at some level, we don't really believe it.
口头上相信我们会死一事,在某种程度上,我们并不真正相信。
Given the thesis about recycling, then, we have reason to believe the soul will continue to exist after we break.
如果循环观点是正确的,那么我们有理由相信,灵魂会在我们消亡之后继续存在
That would be a good argument if we had good reason to believe the conditional, the if-then claim.
如果我们有很好的理由相信这种假设,那这就是个很好的论据。
But not only do we believe that, we have the science that teaches us how to read it as it's read 1400 years ago.
但是我们不仅仅相信,还有专门的学科,来叫我们怎样和1400年一样去诵读。
We will initially think about the first question: Do we have any good reason to believe in souls at all?
我们将要开始考虑第一个问题,我们到底有没有理由去相信灵魂的存在
We make inferences to the existence of things we can't see, when doing that helps us to explain something we can't otherwise explain.
我们推断一些看不到的事物的存在,因为这样做可以便于我们,解释某些我们不相信就无法解释的事情
But of course,nobody here is screaming, from which we can conclude none of us really do believe, fundamentally,deep down,that we're going to die.
但当然现在在场没人在尖叫,那我们得出结论,我们中没有人,从根本上相信自己会死。
Well,maybe the explanation is, although we give lip service to the claim that we're mortal, at some more fundamental level,we don't truly believe it.
也许这个的解释就是,纵然我们口头上说我们会死,在某些最根本的层面上我们其实并不相信。
The question we want to turn to, then, is, "Which of these two views should we believe: the dualist position or the physicalist position?"
接下来,我们的问题是,这两种观点,我们到底应该相信哪一种,二元论还是物理主义
And particularly as probable as we were mentioning, that early Christians believed in something like the body theory of personal identity and believed in bodily resurrection.
尤其是我们刚刚,提到的那种可能,早期的基督教徒相信,人格同一性的肉体论,相信肉体复活。
So what we now need to ask is, can we possibly believe that revision?
所以现在我们要问的是,我们可能相信那样的修正吗?
Suppose that if you--Suppose we believed--we had good reason to believe-- if you really took seriously the thought that you were going to die, you couldn't stop screaming.
假设我们有很好的理由相信-,如果你确实很认真地相信自己会死,你会尖叫不断这个事实。
And it's because of that that I think we shouldn't be dismissive of the dualist when the dualist says, "We've got to believe in souls in order to explain it."
正因如此,我认为我们不应该轻视二元论者,当他们说,我们只有相信灵魂才能解释这些
Orthodoxy maintains the traditions that we believe came from Mount Sinai, that God gives to Moses or people observing Jews, Traditional Jews, Orthodox Jews We keep laws, Oral Torah and within the old tradition.
正统派恪守传统,我们相信这些传统来自于西奈山,在那里上帝将这些传授给摩西和,遵从的犹太教徒,传统犹太教徒,犹太教正统派教徒,我们按照古老的传统遵守法律,口头教律。
Paradise Lost as a whole clearly wants us to believe that God has foreknowledge and it also clearly wants us to believe that we have free will, but the similes seem just as often to open up and to question the poem's doctrinal conclusions.
整体来说很清楚地是想让我们相信,上帝具有先知的能力,并且还想让我们相信人生来有自由的意志,但是这些比喻看起来只是为我们揭露,并质疑了诗歌本身的学理上的总结。
Just like follow the soul was the answer if we believed in the soul theory of personal identity, if we believe in the brain version of the body theory of personal identity, saying personal or not, follow the brain.
就好像,如果我们相信,人格同一性的灵魂论,那么灵魂就是关键,如果我们相信人格同一性的,肉体论的这个版本,只要根据大脑判断就行。
We all do believe something makes it true that two plus one equals three, but it's not the fact that empirical objects-- We don't do empirical experiments to see whether two plus one equals three.
我们都相信有些东西,使2加1等于3是正确的,但这不是说现实的东西,我们不会在现实中做实验,去看看二加一是不是等于三
But we're not asking, is it rational or irrational to not believe that your body's going to die, we're simply asking, noting the fact that, there to seem to be cases where people are surprised to discover that they're mortal.
但我们不是在探讨不相信肉体的死亡,是否合理,我们只是提出,人们发现,有人可能对发现自己将会死亡,感到非常出乎意料。
应用推荐