Derrida, as I said, believes in a kind of seamless web of discourse or discursivity. We are awash in discourse.

德里达，我说过，他相信有一种无缝的网,存在于论述或推论中，我们在论述中是处于同一水平线的。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

But it's also interesting that he says he trusted that traditional living voice more than he trusted written documents.

同样有意思的是，他说自己更相信,口述传统而不是文献。

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

He says, "I believe in the practice and philosophy of what we have agreed to call magic, in what I must call the evocation of spirits, though I do not know what they are."

他说我相信我们所称作的,关于魔法的实践和哲学，我认为那是对灵魂的召唤，尽管我并不知道它们是什么“

耶鲁公开课 - 现代诗歌课程节选

Or maybe we need to distinguish between those things he gives a kind of lip service to, versus those things he truly and fundamentally believes.

或者也许我们需要区别,他口头上说的，和他真正从根本上相信的事情。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

But, he says, if he tries to persuade people of the goodness and the justice of his way of life on simply rational grounds alone, to persuade them that the examined life alone is worth living, he says he will not be believed.

但他表示，假设他试图说服,良善及正直之士,相信其生活方式的作法,仅在简单的理性基础上，或者试图说服他们,经反省的生命才值得活，他说他们也仍然不会相信他。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

You might say,the only way to explain the behavior is to say that at some level, he really does believe his hands are dirty, despite the fact that he says they're not.

唯一的解释也许就是，在某种程度上，他确实还是相信自己的手脏的，尽管他说它们不脏。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Do we believe him in this respect, I mean an important question, do we believe him again, ? is he being sincere in this or is he using this as it were a kind of rhetoric ? with which to envelope himself?

我们相信他这番言论吗，我意指一个重要的问题，我们再次自问是否要相信他，他这么说时是否诚恳,或只是利用这类的修辞,来包裹自己？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选