Milton Friedman makes this argument- All right, so Bill Gates can give to charity if he wants to.
弥尔顿·弗里德曼提出-,你是说,如果盖茨愿意,可以给慈善机构捐款。
Third, some people have said don't the successful like Gates owe a debt to society for their success that they repay by paying taxes.
第三,有人说过,像盖茨这样的成功人士,难道不欠社会,不该通过缴税回报社会吗。
What does count as a violation is an arbitrary taking because that would essentially say, not only to Bill Gates, but to everyone, there is no rule of law.
只有肆意掠夺才算侵犯自然权利,因为从本质上说,那不仅侵犯了比尔·盖茨,还侵犯了其他人,那样就毫无法治可言。
应用推荐