-
The syntax is OK in the sense of, it is an operand, an operator, an operand, so syntactically it's OK.
这里的语法应该是好的，有个运算对象，一个运算符，另外一个运算对象，因此语法上是没错的。
-
but I mark the whole paper up with a lot of red ink if there are mistakes,
但我在批论文的时候，也会把语法错误的地方用红笔标出来，
-
The thematic problems that Milton is attempting to tackle are written into the very grammar and the syntax of the poem.
弥尔顿想要处理的主题,就在诗歌的语法和句子结构里边。
-
It is going to give me back a tuple a collection of two things, and so check out the syntax.
它将给我返回一个数组或者系列的一对值,然后检查一下语法。
-
There is this wonderful overarching voice that unifies everything after all. This is what I call," says de Man, "the rhetoricization of grammar, right--but wait!
有这种包罗万象的声音,它把所有东西都联合起来，这就是我所说的“，德曼说，“语法的修辞化，对了，等等！
-
So, if you want to estimate how many grammatical sentences under twenty words in English, the answer is, "A lot."
如果你想估计一下,用二十个英文单词,可以组成多少个符合语法的句子,答案会是,"很多"
-
So a bit of uninteresting math, a bit of focus on sizes of types, but any questions on syntax or concepts thus far before we now put this to the test?
一些比较无趣的数字，一些关于类型的大小,在我们现在进行试验之前,你们对这其中的语法或概念有什么问题吗？
-
a lot of the tenses and the grammar structure in Croatian is very similar to French,
克罗地亚语的很多时态和语法结构都和法语的很像，
-
This is a good site to go for learning grammar exercises, having listening exercises.
这是个做语法练习和听力练习的好网站。
-
And, as we said before, music has a syntax so that these phrases have to be in a-- arranged in a particular way that makes sense.
就如我们曾经提到的,音乐具有语法,这些乐句必须,以特有方式排列,才有意义
-
It's just a trivial grammatical point about the meaning of the word my.
只是“我的“这个词的琐碎语法点而已。
-
OK. What happens if you actually have something that's both syntactically correct, and appears to have correct static semantics, and you run it?
好，当你的代码语法,没错误，并且也有正确的静态语义，你去运行它的时候会发生什么呢？
-
It doesn't arbitrarily stop anywhere because rhetoric and grammar remain irreducible. We have to keep thinking of them as being uncooperative with each other.
它不会武断地停到任何一个地方,因为修辞和语法是不可削减的，我们必须,一直把它们看成是相互不合作的。
-
They create a language with rich syntax and morphology and phonology, terms that we'll understand in a few minutes.
他们用丰富的语法,语态和语音,创造出一种语言,我们马上会来讲这些术语的
-
Now this is perhaps, frankly this is really the reason that people tend to get confused with the new piece of syntax because the * means different things in different contexts.
也许，这就是大家对这个新语法,混淆的原因,因为*的在不同的环境中有不同的意义。
-
I just want to remind you, if I wanted to, for example, type in an expression like that, notice the syntactical form, it's an expression, a number, followed by an operand, followed by another expression.
我想要提醒下大家，如果你想要，例如，输入一个这样的表达式，注意语法形式，这是个表达式，一个数字，后面是一个运算对象，后面是另外一个表达式。
-
It must be, after all, a grammaticization of rhetoric," the whole point of which is that the worm of interpretation keeps turning. All right?
那一定是将修辞语法化“，整个观点,诠释的螺丝一直在旋转，对吧？
-
He published a treatise that he had written earlier on grammar, inventing his own system for the understanding and the learning of the Latin language.
发表了一篇他之前写的关于语法的论文，在这篇论文中他创建了自己的一套理解和学习,拉丁文的体系。
-
And syntax uses another neat trick, this is defined by Wilhelm von Humboldt as the "Infinite use of finite media."
语法使用了另一种神奇的把戏,威廉·冯·洪堡,将之定义为"有限域的无限应用"
-
Okay, so while not equal to, so bang equals, exclamation point equals is computer science syntax for saying not equal to, 0 while not equal to 2 which it is not, it is equal to 0.
好的，尽管不等于不是相等的反写,但惊叹号在计算机科学的语法是不等于的意思，尽管不等于2，但它是等于。
-
So. Here's the syntax of the function.
这就是函数的语法。
-
You can kind of see where the syntax is going, looks like a loop, but you can kind of put blocks inside of you, and the little arrow suggests that once you get to the bottom just like our socks example, you're gonna do the following again.
从某种程度上你可以看到它的语法构成,像个循环，你也可以把，一些程序块放到循环中，如同短袜的例子，这个小箭头暗示你一旦到达底部,你将会重复接下来的事情。
-
He makes a perfectly plausible argument to the effect that the question is grammatical rather than rhetorical.
他提出了一个貌似非常可信的论据,大意是说这个问句是语法型的，而不是修辞型的。
-
Well, you can implement this in a few different ways but here's one approach that uses some int counter=0 of the syntax we just looked at, int counter equals 0.
当然，你可以有好几种方法来实现这一目标,但是其中一种方法,只需要用到我们刚刚看到的那种语法。
-
And most linguists would argue "Yes," that languages are highly constrained in how they do things.
大多数语言学家们都会回答"是的",语言在很大程度上依赖于语法规则的使用
-
The question is, "Are there inherent limits in our abilities to come up with grammars?"
这个问题是,"我们创造语法的能力,是否存在天生的局限"
-
Syntax is a more technical term but it means the same thing as grammar.
这里说的语法是更加专业的术语,在意义上和平时说的语法是一样的
-
Now finally, I'm going to do something with this crazy syntax.
最后，我将用这个疯狂的语法,来处理一些事情。
-
And one of the puzzles of syntactic rules, or one of the issues of them, is that different rules can conspire to create the same sentence.
语法规则的一个谜团或问题是,不同规则可以共同作用来产生同一个句子
-
Now, you can probably guess what this piece of syntax does.
现在你们应该知道语法是用来干嘛的吧。
应用推荐