We'll talk more about this later, but it often happens that when you change your program to solve one problem you break it, and things that used to work don't work.
我们以后会更多的去讨论者一点,但是经常发生的情况是当你因为,一个问题修改你的程序的时候,你修改了程序,但原来没问题的模块。
when you want to find out specifically what category of object you are discussing.
当你想了解你们所讨论的事情中特定一类的情况。
But now it's going to make more sense because in that case we were just talking about single electron atoms, and now we're talking about a case where we actually can see shielding.
但是现在能讲得通了,因为在那个情况中我们仅仅是现在我们讨论的是,讨论单电子原子,看到屏蔽的案例,我们能看到屏蔽。
I'm sure there must have been individual exceptions to everything, but we're talking about the overwhelming reality.
我相信任何事物都会有例外情况,但是我们所讨论的是无可辩驳的事实
That's a really good question, and I'm talking in terms of generalities here but the specifics matter.
这是一个很好的问题,我在这里讨论的是普遍情况,但是还有一些比较特殊的例子
So I promised a while ago now, that we were going to come back and look at this game under some other possible payoffs.
我保证,我们以后还会讨论这些在,其它博弈下的收益情况
that they can't stop talking about their last night out together.
大家滔滔不绝地讨论着昨晚出去玩的情况。
And, in fact, we're going to be talking about right-handed people for the most part, making generalizations in what I'll talk about now.
实际上,我们在大多数情况下讨论到的,都是右利手的人,再从中得出我所讲的一般性结论
But equally the case, that the views that I'll be developing in the lectures are, although not necessarily unique to me, aren't all laid out in the readings.
还有这种情况,我在讲座中展开讨论的观点,尽管对我而言并不一定珍奇,在书中也无法全部找到。
And if we talk about chlorine, and both of the chlorines are the same in this case, we start with a valence number of 7 for chlorine, and then we subtract 6, because it had 6 lone pair electrons around each of the chlorine atoms.
而如果我们讨论氯的话,在这个例子中两个氯的情况都是一样的,从七个价电子开始,然后减去六,因为每个氯原子周围,都有六个孤对电子。
When we talk about resonance structures, we're talking about cases that have the same arrangement of atoms the key is the atoms are the same, and the thing that is different is the arrangement of electrons here.
当我们讨论共振结构的时候,我们讨论的是原子排布相同情况,关键在于原子是相同的,不一样的只是电子排布。
And if we talk about what's going on in areas, or with atoms that have high electronegativity, and we think about whether they're electron donors or electron acceptors, what would you expect for an atom that has high electronegativity?
如果我们要讨论这片区域的情况,或者说讨论这些电负性很高的原子,我们会把它们想象成电子的施主,还是受主?,大家认为哪一种,是电负性很高的原子?
But you need to be able to predict what kind of properties a certain atom's going to have within a molecule, whether you're talking about something, for example, that's very electronegative, or something that is not electronegative at all, it is going to make a difference in terms of thinking about how molecules are structured and also how they interact with other molecules.
但是你需要能够预言,什么性质,某个原子在分子中能够具有,无论你讨论的是哪一种情况,比如,它有很高的电负性,还是它根本没有电负性,都将会产生影响,对这个分子的结构,以及与其它分子相互作用的情况。
Remember that when we're talking about 4s1, 3d10, that's one of those exceptions where a completely filled d orbital is more stable than we would expect.
回想上节课的内容我们知道,当我们讨论4s1,3d10,的时候,这是其中一个例外的情况,当,d,轨道全满的时候,电子排布要比我们想象的更加稳定。
We're asking the question, taking S2 as given, what S1 maximizes this expression and as the gentleman at the back said, I'm going to differentiate and then I'm going to set the thing equal to 0.
我们来讨论在S2已知的情况下,S1的最大值是多少,就像坐在后排的先生说的那样,我们要去求导然后令导数等于0
z So the main idea here is z effective is not z, so don't try to plug one in for the other, they're absolutely different quantities in any case when we're not talking about a 1 electron atom.
所以这里主要的观点是有效的z不同于,所以不要尝试将一个插入到另一个,当我们不在讨论1个电子的原子时,它们在任何情况下是绝对不同的量子数。
应用推荐