-
This answer that says I just undercut Pepsi, that's true provided that Pepsi hasn't gone above the monopoly price.
比百事定价低点的答案,只有在百事没有高于,垄断价格时才是正确的
-
We're just producing Coca-Cola and Pepsi and for want of a better world, spewing it out into the market.
我们只是生产可口可乐和百事可乐,只是投入市场造福百姓而已
-
when I talked on the first day of class about my own boyhood experience when a Coca-Cola was an eight ounce glass or a Pepsi was an eight ounce bottle rather, that was a serving.
上课第一天,我讲了我少年时代的经历,那时可口可乐装在八盎司的玻璃瓶里,百事可乐也一样,那是一餐份量
-
We're Coca-Cola and Pepsi, so we really don't want to have to bring the mafia in, Although maybe we do, I don't know.
我们是可口可乐和百事可乐公司,我们都不想将黑手党卷进来,可能也希望他们介入吧,谁知道呢
-
So the products we mentioned last time were Coke and Pepsi, but you could think of other products that are pretty much identical.
上次举例的产品是可口可乐和百事可乐,但你们可以把它想象成其他,同样的产品
-
So Patrick, our manager of Pepsi believes that Coca-Cola is going to produce this quantity and he's agreed to produce this quantity.
百事的经理帕特里克认为可口可乐,会按照协议产量来生产,他也会这么做
-
Suppose the other guy didn't exist, Suppose Pepsi didn't exist, so Coke has the whole market, then we would solve out this problem.
假设对手不存在,假设百事可乐不存在,那么可口可乐占领整个市场,然后我们就可以解决这个问题
-
in whatever it is you guys imagine makes Coke and Pepsi different, it could be that thing.
你们所认为的可口可乐和百事可乐的不同,它可以是那个不同
-
It's going to be /2 in the case where Coke and Pepsi cost exactly the same.
当可口可乐和百事可乐的价格一样时,销量将是/2
-
If Pepsi is the low price then Coke sells nothing.
如果百事的价格低则可口可乐就卖不出去
-
So this is the total quantity of Coke plus Pepsi.
也就是可口可乐和百事可乐的总产量
-
When I was a boy the eight ounce Coke was the default serving, and when I was a child when it was time to have a Coke or a Pepsi you had eight ounces and the event was over.
当我还是个小男孩的时候,可口可乐,或是百事可乐都是八盎司装的,而且最多就只能喝一瓶
-
So I started off with an example that's pretty bad for this story, namely, Coke and Pepsi.
我以一个例子作为开始,一个不太恰当的例子,即,可口可乐和百事可乐
-
There's one other possibility here I've missed which is what if Pepsi prices at marginal cost itself?
这里还缺少一个可能性,即,如果百事定价在边际成本怎么办
-
Pepsi's pricing below cost, what's your best response?
百事可乐定价低于成本,你的最佳对策是什么
-
Coke and Pepsi are producing this stuff.
公司分别生产可口可乐和百事可乐
-
What if Pepsi prices at marginal cost?
如果百事定价在边际成本怎么办
-
And notice that if Pepsi has priced above the monopoly price, suppose Pepsi has priced this good so high that it's above the monopoly price, then, as the gentleman said, I can capture the whole market by pricing just below Pepsi.
注意如果百事设定的价格高于垄断价格,假设百事把价格定得太高了以至于,高于垄断价格,那么像那位先生说的,我可以用低于百事的价格来占领整个市场
-
So Steve and Patrick are respectively the managers of Coca-Cola and Poland Spring and Patrick believes that the Coca-Cola manager is going to may be we should just make this Coke and Pepsi since two identical they're near enough and identical, right?
史蒂夫和帕特里克分别是,可口可乐和波兰泉的经理,帕特里克认为可口可乐的经理打算,或许该用可口可乐和百事可乐,他们俩才是对手是吧
-
This time, however, instead of setting quantities, instead of just deciding how much Coke and Pepsi to produce and spewing it out in the market and letting prices take care of themselves, this time the firms are going to set prices and let quantities take care of themselves.
这次不是规定产量,上次是确定,可口可乐和百事可乐的产量,运到市场上销售,并让价格自主的浮动,而这次,公司将要预先设定价格,并让产量自动调节
-
So a number of you, even if the price was just a tiny bit different might have a preference for one rather than the other, so without getting in trouble by putting the camera on you, how many of you would have a preference, if the prices were essentially the same how many of you would have a strict preference for Pepsi?
那么你们中的很多人,尽管价格只有一点点不同,也许还是倾向于其中一个产品,不让你们上镜头而招来麻烦,你们谁会有倾向,如果价格差不多,谁会倾向选择百事可乐
-
There's no Pepsi in the market and 1-P1 quantity of Coke is sold.
百事可乐卖不出去,可口可乐的销量是1-P1
应用推荐