• Now this may suggest a certain condescension both toward theory and toward literary text, which is not at all intended.

    选择这篇文章也许意味着,要对理论和文本进行一定的浓缩,这一点不是我想要的。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • What's the alternative? The alternative,it seems,for the soul theorist, Shelly Kagan is to say,neither of them is Shelly Kagan.

    还有什么选择,灵魂理论者还有的选择,就是说他们都不是。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • And then I said--then I thought back on the Freud lecture and so I asked him, ?" "If you could marry anybody you want, who would it be?"

    之后我又想到弗洛依德的理论,然后我就问他,“如果你谁都能娶,你会选择娶谁“

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • It's much more a question of reminding you ; that if you can do it with this, you can do it with anything; but also of reminding you that, after all, reading--reading just anything--is a complex and potentially almost unlimited activity.

    选择它主要是为了告诉你们,如果你能用理论来分析这篇,那么分析任何一篇都没问题;,还想提醒大家,阅读任何文章都是个复杂的过程,其中有无限种可能。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • But since I don't believe in souls, I want to choose between the body view and the personality view.

    但因为我不相信灵魂,我想从身体理论和人格理论选择

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • I think we're going to perhaps be drawn to different answers, depending on whether we accept the body view or the personality view.

    我想我们也许该根据自己是相信肉体理论,还是人格理论选择答案。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • But there's nothing in the body view to give us a reason to make that choice.

    但肉体理论没有一个标准让我们做出选择

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • And it might occur to some of you that this seems to be an analogy with the Darwinian theory of natural selection where there's a random assortment of random mutations.

    也许你们之中会有人觉得,这和达尔文的自然选择理论,看上去很相似,自然选择就是随机突变的随机分配。

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • As far as I can see,the best option for the body theorist at this point is to add--no surprises here--a no branching rule.

    据我所知,肉体理论者最好的选择就是,毫无意外地,是加上一条无分支规则。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • If you don't like the no branching rule, it's not clear what your alternatives are.

    如果你不接受无分支理论,你的选择就不明确。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Okay. So that's the basic distinction and, as I say, as far as I can see it's irreconcilable so it leaves us with a choice that really does have to be made, and it's a choice which looms over a course in literary theory and coming to understand the tradition of literary theory.

    这就是二者基本的不同之处,我以前说过,只要二者不能兼容,我们就不得不从中选择一个,这个选择将会一直出现在文学理论课,和理解文学理论传统的过程中。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定