Isn't there a kind of egalitarianism, so to speak, built in to the conception ? of rational animal and political animal?

是否有种平等主义，建构于,理性动物与政治动物的概念之中？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

They would say, we are rational or autonomous and they are not.

他们可能会说，我们是理性的，是自主的,动物可不是这样。

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

To be a political animal means first to possess speech or reason that allows us to participate in a community or a way of life governed by shared standards of justice and injustice.

要成为政治动物的首要,是拥有演说或理性的能力,以让我们参与社群,或由共享公正,与不公标准所统治的生活方式。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Doesn't Aristotle call man the rational animal, the being with logos, suggesting that all human beings have a desire for knowledge and the desire to cultivate their minds and live as free persons.

亚里士多德不是称人类为理性的动物吗，具有，Logos，的生物，并暗示所有的人类,都有求知欲,且想要陶冶他的身心,并过自由的生活。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选