So if you demonstrate something by writing an intelligent answer just by outlining it and saying, well, what I would do is I would equate the energy lambda and then solve for lambda, I can see that you know what is going on.
如果你想证明一些东西,通过写下一些很天才的答案,仅仅大致说一下,好的,我想做的是能量相等,然后解出,我能看到你知道怎么做。
I stopped at the stoplight and there was a homeless guy there, a beggar,
我停下车等红灯,然后看到一个无家可归的人在那里乞讨,
So if I scroll now to the right, I should see a comma after the closed quote and then what two values?
所以我滚动到右边,我应当看到一个逗号,在右引号的右边,然后这两个值是多少?
But I got a couple of other of these strange looking things in there with underbars to them.
我可以在这片代码中看到这些,然后我需要一些可以给我,返回这些信息的东西,但是这里还有一些看起来。
I'm going to set up an index, which is going to tell me where to look, starting at the first part of the list, right?
索引告诉我从哪里开始检索数组,对不对?,然后我会去记录下我做了多少次比较,这样我就能看到这个算法的工作量了?
Oh, there's a man at the store and now we have a loop where he is just looking through my inventory one at a time and reciting what it is I actually picked up.
商店里有一个人,现在我们有一个循环,通过这个循环他可以看到我的库存,然后显示出来我实际上都采摘了哪些水果。
You find some way of systematically going through the list. Yet, I often see people, when they're debugging, proceeding at what, to me, looks almost like a random fashion of looking for the bug.
是不是目标元素,我们有一种系统化的,遍历数组的方法,然后我经常看到,有些人调试的时候。
应用推荐