So an adversary who's actually trying to break your programs 'cause frankly too much software these days is not written with a paranoia in mind.
或者说是你的敌人,而且千方百计地要破坏你的程序,唉,这种漏洞百出的软件我见过的是在太多了。
Now if this is the case, it seems to me that one has found a loophole in Gadamer's conservatism about what the reader can do.
如果是这样的话,我认为大家在葛达玛对,读者理解能力的保守主义论中,能找到一个漏洞。
This is necessary, it's hard to find holes in a Nobel Prize worthy idea.
这是很必要的,在一个获得诺贝尔的想法中,很难发现漏洞。
You won't find these bugs in your handout, right?
你在你们的讲义上找不到漏洞对吗?
It's because they're changing enforcement of the taxes and changing amounts of loopholes, so most countries have a tax rate of about a third, but corporations are paying less than a third of their profits to taxes.
是因为政府改变了征税的强制措施,并改进了征税中存在的漏洞,因此大多数国家的税率都在三分之一左右,但是公司实际支付的税额都少于,他们利润的三分之一
But if there's one thing and this is a little risky because there are always holes in any claim like this but if there's one distinct feature of the Old South society and indeed its leadership and most of its people, it would be what we might label anti-modernism.
但有一点,具有一定的风险,因为任何论点中都会有漏洞,如果说旧南方社会,的领导层和大部分人民,都有一个显著的特点,那就是在我们看来,他们是反现代的
And so similarly as Gmail's priority inbox, it's gonna be pretty flawed for a lot of us at least initially because it just doesn't know the answers a priori correctly unless we teach it or program it to be better. There is also another flaw in here or multiple flaws arguably.
类似于Gmail的优先收件箱,在起初使用时对大多数人来说它是有缺陷的,因为它不知道如何正确判断优先级,除非我们事先告诉它或编写程序改良它,另外这里存在一个或多个漏洞,可以说是缺陷。
In Python, it'll find it, I think one bug at a time, right John?
在Python中,它会找到它的,我觉得一回能找一个漏洞,对么John?
应用推荐