-
And as for taxes, the Bush tax cuts as John said, are set to expire very substantially by the end of 2010.
至于在税收方面，约翰刚才也说过，布什的减税政策，会在2010年底，最终期满失效。
-
or the tax cuts from the wealthy, for the wealthy that were instituted under the Bush administration.
或者在布什政府领导下，给于富人减税的政策。
-
and he started with the position that you ought to cut taxes but only where you can find offsetting cuts and government spending.
最开始，他的观点是,减税是正道,但必须先想到如何补偿这部分损失,如何削减财政支出。
-
Those were tax cuts only for the richest, 1% or 2% of the country,
那是给仅有全国1%或者2%的最富有的人减税，
-
However, that all changed in 2003 with the Jobs and Growth Tax Reconciliation Act of 2003, which cut the rate of taxation of dividends to 15%-- the same rate that capital gains are taxed.
但在2003年这些都变了,2003年颁布的《就业与进一步减税协调法案》,将股利的税率减至15%,与资本收益的征税率相同
-
But if you are going to make them permanent ? where are you gonna cut spending?
然而，一旦决定长期减税,又如何才能削减财政支出呢？
-
And he ended with the position that the only way to put pressure on spending was by cutting taxes I never heard him use the phrase " but he subscribed to the starve-the-beast thesis.
到最后，他倒过来了,说，要想给政府施压，来削减财政支出,减税是必由之路,他倒是没有明确说,但依我看，他用的这招叫“把帽子扔过墙去。
-
So you start by cutting taxes.
那么，你赞成先减税。
-
Go ahead and let the Bush tax cuts expire on the theory that the government needs extra revenues to cover the higher spending or should he try to ? make the Bush tax cuts permanent, Ken Judd?
第一种是让布什减税政策自动终结，然后增税,这个倒也在情在理，毕竟政府需要,额外增加财政收入，来承担高额的财政支出,第二种是，采取措施,让该政策继续生效，肯·贾德，你怎么看？
-
By the way, by the way, we should say Reagan cut taxes and Clinton left them low.
顺便插一句，我们应当这么说,里根是减税了，但克林顿维持了低税率。
-
Do you have any views on the fiscal side of things the government is talking now 850 billion dollar package, the mix of fiscal stimulus, tax cuts, and the like?
你对政府财政是怎么看的,例如，财政刺激,减税等，8500亿的刺激计划？
-
Now, that seem to me to fit what I saw of experience in the 1980's when Reagan cut taxes and then there was this... they were worried about the climbing deficits So he clawed back some of the tax cuts in TEFRA, that huge tax.
现在看来，这正好符合,政府在20世纪90年代的做法,当年里根决意减税，然后争议四起。,很多人担心财政赤字会由此攀升,他后来颁布了税赋公平与会计责任法案，以追回部分税款。
-
We are hoping that they will not continue the tax cuts,
我们希望他们不要继续减税，
-
Whatever the proposal is on by anybody, Obama, Clinton or McCain I think it should be consistent And so the question is that ? should you make the tax cuts permanent?
任何提案，不管是谁制定的，奥巴马也好，克林顿或者麦凯恩也罢,我认为都应当坚持实施下去,明确了这一点，那么现在的问题是,减税政策到底是否应该长期实施？
-
Even with the tax cuts we are talking about.
尽管实行减税政策。
-
.. But McCain is, McCain wants to increase... What you are saying effectively is the next president must raise taxes in a massive way Because you are saying you can only cut taxes if you cut spending.
然而麦凯恩想要增加。,那照你的意思,下届政府必须大幅增税了，毫无悬念,因为你说一旦减税,就必须跟着精简开支。
-
Well we could begin with George Washington Alright, for your sake, we toss in John Kennedy ... who cut taxes. -Because... the Kennedy tax cuts and the Reagan tax cuts ... were both major tax cuts. -Did you hear me ask him ? for a one-word answer? Did you hear me?
那干脆从乔治·华盛顿谈起得了，真是的,好吧，看在你的面子上，姑且把他算上吧,他好歹也减税了，-因为。,肯尼迪的减税和里根的,都不可等闲视之，-我不是让他,只回答一个字吗？他怎么说这么多？
-
And you can kick it down the road ... but somebody down the road... I think it's very important to make the tax cuts permanent to prevent the taxes from increasing It would be really a large drag on the economy.
你可以视若无睹,但总得有人来。,我认为，长期实行减税政策十分重要,这样可以避免税率增加,否则会极大地阻碍经济发展。
-
Some spending has gone up a little bit as a proportion of GDP ... But it worked. It did work. You cut the taxes... But it then fell apart in 2001.
尽管有些支出，按GDP的比例有过小幅增长,但毕竟奏效了，事实摆在那里，先减税。,但好景不长，到2001年就不行了。
应用推荐