Everyone is an enforcer or what Locke calls " "the executor"of the state of nature and he means executor literally.
每个人都是执行者,或洛克说的,自然法的“执刑者,这个“执刑者“可以字面上理解。
Locke says that legitimate government is government founded on consent and who, nowadays, would disagree with him?
洛克说合法政府是建立在同意的基础上,而现如今又有谁会不同意他的观点呢?
Well, I mean, just to defend Locke, he does say that there are some times in which you can't take another person's land.
要为洛克辩护的话,他的确说到了,几种情况下,你不能掠夺他人的土地。
Does Locke have a way out of this or is he basically sanctioning an all-powerful government, despite everything he says about unalienable rights?
洛克对此能自圆其说吗,还是说他其实是支持万能政府的呢,尽管他说了那么多什么不可剥夺的权利?
Because it's essential to locke's case that private property can arise even before there is any government.
因为洛克理论中必不可少的一点是说,私有财产在任何政府建立前就已经产生。
John Locke said private property arises because when we mix our labor with things, unowned things, we come to aquire a property right in those things.
约翰·洛克说,私有财产权之所以兴起,是因为我们将劳动付诸于无主的事物,所以取得了这些东西的产权。
So that part of Locke, that beginning of 138, seems to support Ben's reading.
洛克在138节开头说的这几句,似乎支持了本的解读。
I don't think Locke says you have to sign anything.
洛克并没有说过你需要签署什么。
All right, so what does Locke say there? Yes?
那么洛克对此是怎么说的,你来说?
At the same time, he is saying that just by picking an acorn or taking an apple or maybe killing a buffalo on a certain amount of land, that makes it yours because it's your labor and your labor would enclose that land.
同时,洛克说只要在特地土地拾得橡果或摘下苹果,或杀一头水牛,你就拥有了这块土地,因为这是你的劳动,你通过劳动圈定了这块土地。
..That's just as good as the land that you took, so... That's true. Locke says there has to be this right to private property in the earth is subject to the provision that there be as much and as good left for others. What's your name?
而且是跟你占有的土地一样好的。,的确如此,洛克说过,土地私人所有必须遵守的是,还有足够多足够好的土地留给别人,你叫什么?
应用推荐