What about Locke's account of private property and how it can arise before government and before law comes on the scene?

大家如何看待洛克关于私有财产,及其如何能早于任何政府法律而产生，这一观点？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

When it comes to differences of human rights and religious practices, so Claims and Conflict, people in different disciplines say "We need stronger laws, we need this, we need that."

当说到人权问题和宗教实践,在各国的不同时，也就是所谓的“冲突中的观点“,持有不同观点的人都会说,“我们需要更完备的法律，需要这个，需要那个“

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

But when you look at it in a comparative light in its legal context, we see that it's a polemic against the class distinctions that were being drawn in antecedent and contemporary legal systems, such as the Code of Hammurabi.

但当你在法律背景下以一种比较的观点看待它时，会发现它驳倒了存在于先前的和同时代的,法律体系中的阶级差异,例如，汉穆拉比法典。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

This idea that no law can violate our right to life, liberty, and property would seem to support the idea of a government so limited that it would gladden the heart of the libertarian after all.

任何法律都不能侵犯生命自由和财产权的观点,似乎是支持“有限政府“这一观点的,这点无疑很讨自由主义者欢心。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选