So I wrote my dissertation on Byron as a result of that-- nothing complicated, no deep reason for doing these things.
所以我论文写的就是关于拜伦的-,没有太多的考虑,就是因为我喜欢。
So you might ask well, why are we using this model if it clearly doesn't take into account quantum mechanics?
那么大家可能会问为什么我们要用这个,显然没有考虑量子力学的模型呢?
Because if you think about it, suicide doesn't change the fundamental nature of the human condition, life followed by death.
因为如果你考虑一下,自杀没有改变人类处境的基本本质,生后即是死。
If you go onto the continent,though, they tended to be interrupted by World War I and World War II.
如果你们往欧洲大陆国家那里考虑,一战和二战期间的数据几乎是没有存档的
And I'll also remind you, and we're going to see this in the next example, we talked about looking at the worst case behavior. In these cases there's no best case worst case, it's just doing one computation.
我还要提醒大家的就是,我们也会在下一个例子里发现者一点,我们谈到了要去考虑最坏的情况,在下面这些例子里,没有好情况坏情况之分,就只是一次运算。
Derrida famously, notoriously, said "there is nothing outside the text," right? What he meant by that, of course, is that there's nothing but text.
德里达著名地,恶名昭彰地,说道,文本之外什么都没有“,是吧,当然,他意思就是说,需要考虑的只有文本。
The model doesn't take into account differences between the groups in voter turnout, based on the candidates.
这个模型没有考虑到,不同候选人所在党派的,名额数有差异
And there is this separation which is a balance of attractive forces because the chloride is net negative and the sodium is net positive, but both of them, regardless of net charge, have electrons.
这里有一个平衡,引力的平衡,由于氯离子带有负的净电荷,钠离子带有正的净电荷,但是它们两个,没有考虑净电荷,电子。
What else matters that I haven't considered in this little discussion?
还有其他的机制,我这里没有考虑到的吗?
Well, I think that once again, they've made the same mistake the previous case did, that they assigned a dollar value to human life, and once again, they failed to take account things like suffering and emotional losses by the families.
我觉得他们犯了与前面案例,相同的错误,量化了生命的价值,但同样的,他们没有考虑受害者家人承受的,痛苦和精神损失。
Life as a waiter, not so bad thinking about it in isolation.
侍应生的生活,单独考虑也没有那么糟糕。
But there's the middle possibility, which is not so much think about them and deny them, not so much think about them, accept them and act accordingly, but simply don't think about them.
但有一个折中的可能性,没有考虑太多也没有否认它们,没有考虑太多,接受它们并采取相应的行为,而只是完全不去考虑。
First of all, Empson doesn't really kind of settle into - a sense that it's all about the reader-- that is to say, that it's all about the reader's experience of the literary.
首先,Empson并没有真正,从读者角度考虑问题-,也就是说,没有从读者的文学经历上考虑。
So this is not even thinking about the other electron shielding, just if we think of the fact, all we need to think about is that the effect of going to a further away n n as we go down the table.
到现在我们甚至还没有考虑,其它电子的屏蔽效果,即使我们要考虑这个因素,我们需要考虑也就是,沿着周期表的某一列往下走,距离会逐渐变远,将起最重要的作用,actually,dominates,这一结果所产生的影响。
You might think it's because of this synergy that they don't take into account correctly.
你可能认为这是因为,他们没有正确的考虑协同的作用
Keep in mind we do have this p orbital here and it's coming right out at us. And this p orbital is here, but it's empty, it doesn't have any electrons in it, that's why we don't have to worry about it in terms of getting our electrons as far away from each other as possible.
他们程120度角互相远离,这样它们离得最远,记住我们这里确实有个p轨道,它朝向我们,这里有个p轨道,但它是空的,里面没有电子,这就是为什么我们在考虑。
And I picked looking at methane so we could see if there are other factors that we're not considering, that we need to maybe tweak our model a little bit, and I think we'll find that we do if we take a look at a polyatomic molecule, methane, CH4 so c h 4.
我选择甲烷这个例子,我们可以看到,如果有一些我们没有考虑到的因素,我们需要修改一下我们的模型,我们看一看,甲烷CH4这个多原子分子,就会知道这一点,甲烷。
应用推荐