• And what I'm showing here is not on your notes, if you're interested you can look it up in your book.

    我这里展示的没有在你们的讲义里给出,如果你们感兴趣的话可以看看课本。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • But dualism doesn't so much offer the explanation typically as just say, "Well, maybe we'd be better off positing something immaterial."

    但是二元论还没有给出,这样的解释,也许我们假设非物质的存在会好一些

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • I want to mention that 5 you're going to get problem-set five is posted today, and I'll write which ones you can already do so far, because you don't have class on Monday.

    我要指出的是,今天会贴出来习题集,我会给出你们现在可以做的题目,因为周一没有课。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • These are all plausible reasons and possible contributors but nobody's got the home run answer yet.

    这些原因听起来都很有道理,但还没有人能给出准确的答案

    耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

  • Very good yes, and that's a big argument that nobody has a good answer for.

    好问题,还没有给出令人信服的答案

    耶鲁公开课 - 古希腊历史简介课程节选

  • But, actually, we didn't do that in a general way.

    但是实际上我们没有给出普遍的方法。

    麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

  • Well, Modigliani and Miller are leaving the room; they say it doesn't matter.

    这里莫迪利阿尼和米勒没有给出解释,他们说这不重要

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • That is correct, but you don't want to give it a definite push.

    这没错,但你没有给出一个确定的推力

    耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

  • I haven't given you-- I've given you roughly the choices, the choice they're going to be for the attacker which pass to choose, and for the defender which pass to defend.

    我还没有说完,我给出了大致的选择,入侵者选择从哪个途径入侵,而防卫者选择在哪里设防

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • And they didn't put their explanation of what they thought was going on, it just sort of was observing what they saw.

    而且他们并没有给出解释,而是仅仅介绍了他们所观测到的内容。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • But notice if it's a tie, that doesn't give us what we were looking for.

    不过请注意,如果是平局,这还是没有给出我们想要的答案

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • I can't see any good reason to believe premise two, and as far as I can see, Plato doesn't actually give us any reason to believe it in the dialogue.

    我找不到什么很好的原因来相信前提二,在我看来,柏拉图在对话录中,也没有给出任何令人信服的理由

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • So there's not a counterexample, now that we interpret the relevant notion of invisibility as undetectibility.

    所以就没有了反例,因为我们给出的无形这个词的解释,是无法检测。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • And in terms of doing this for your homework, I actually want to mention that in the back page of your notes I attached a periodic table that does not have electron configurations on them. It's better to practice doing electron configurations when you cannot actually see the electron configurations.

    关于你们的作业,是在你们讲义的后面的页,我附上了一张,没有给出电子构型的周期表,最好联系一下做出电子构型,当你们实际上看不到,电子构型的时候。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • the answer is the body theory doesn't give it.

    肉体理论就并没有给出这样东西。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • So things are not... I haven't given you the numbers for the middle but... So you can see that whoever it was who said, you're slightly better off, you score with slightly higher probabilities when you kick to your natural side is exactly right.

    所以事情不像是……,我虽然没有给出中路的概率,但是,我们先不管这些数字到底是谁总结的,我们发现我们走运了,当你从自然方向攻门的时候,你进球的概率会稍微提高

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So it's really neat to think that your counterparts 100 years ago right here at MIT could have been sitting in a class where they had Lewis as their lecturer, and he's putting forth these ideas -- these are actually his lecture notes, even though it wasn't even published yet, and giving this idea of Lewis structure, which is exactly what we keep using today in order to make a lot of these predictions.

    因此会有很棒的感觉,当想一想一百年以前像你们一样,在这上学的同学可能正坐在教室里,听路易斯讲课,而他正在提出这些想法-,-而这些正是他的课堂讲义,尽管当时还没有发表,但已经给出了路易斯结构的思想,这正是我们直到今天都一直在用的,用它来做很多预测。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定