We've argued that once we realize those aren't going to be played, that 2 and 9 aren't going to be played.

我们明白了一旦我们知道了,无人会采用那些策略时,那么也没有人会选立场2和9

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So Alpha in this case is better against Alpha, and Beta is better against Beta, but neither dominates each other.

所以对方选α时我应该也选α,她选β我也应该选β,这里没有优势策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

The chess-playing computer programs think of moves, think of strategies no one's thought of before.

国际象棋程序会思考如何下子,会想出没有人曾想到的策略

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I don't put them in any strategic order.

我并没有给他们安排了任何有策略性的顺序。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

And political leaders have represented this to their people as so it were a humanitarian effort which it is But they have not made clear to the people that they are fighting a war, they are fighting a war because of threat to them as well.

政府人员说这是一个人道主义的策略,但是他们并没有说明他们在进行一场战争，因为阿富汗对他们有威胁。

普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

On the other hand, we've just argued that you don't have a dominant strategy here; it's not the case that easy dominates hard.

我们刚才说这里没有优势策略,平坦之途并不总是优于崎岖之途

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

You can work through this game and you can check pretty quickly that nothing is dominated.

当你从头到尾 仔细分析过之后,你会发现这里没有劣势策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

You also saw firms that were monopolists and monopolists don't have any competitors to worry about, so that's not a particularly strategic situation.

又比如说垄断企业,垄断企业没有竞争对手,所以这也不是策略形势

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So I claim that neither player has a dominated strategy, let's just check.

我说没有参与人存在劣势策略,我们来验证一下

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So some of the strategies that we didn't throw away were best responses to things, but the things they were best responses to have now been thrown away.

这些没有被剔除的策略,是某种情况下的最佳对策,但剩余的最佳对策现在可能也要被剔除

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Another way of saying it is: neither player wants to move away.

换句话说,没有参与人想要采取别的策略了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Beta is better against Beta. There's no dominance going on here.

她选β我也应该选β,这次没有优势策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Henry. Henry. So Henry is saying sure i don't have a dominated strategy.

亨利认为我们确实没有劣势策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

It seems as though while you don't have a dominating strategy, it seems like Hannibal is better off attacking through-- It seems like he would attack through the easy pass.

虽然看起来你好像没有优势策略,但似乎汉尼拔将军最好的选择是,他应该会选择从平坦之途入侵

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

All right, so this gentleman is saying... There's no dominant strategy so - Right, so this gentleman's saying, a good reason for choosing Alpha in this game is it's less risky.

很好,他说,这里没有优势策略 所以,没错,他说,选α是因为这样做风险更小

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And underlining what arises in this game, notice that in this game we're able to eliminate one of the strategies, in this case the strategy of shooting to the middle, even though nothing was dominated.

我们从这个博弈中可以得出,我们能够剔除其中的一个策略,在本案例中是从中路射门,尽管这里并没有劣势策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

No, neither strategy is dominated.

没有,没有劣势策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So what Christine is arguing is, even though it's the case that 2 is not a dominated strategy, if we do the process of iterative deletion of dominated strategies and we delete the dominated strategies, then maybe we should look again and see if it's dominated now.

克里斯汀说的是,即使选择立场2不是劣势策略,如果我们迭代剔除劣势策略,然后我们剔除掉了劣势策略,然后再来回头看看还有没有劣势策略了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

What Patrick said was: no, Player I does not have a dominated strategy.

帕特里克刚所说的是,参与者I没有劣势策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So Allen is saying if Player I is choosing this strategy and Player II is choosing her corresponding strategy here, neither player has an incentive to deviate.

艾伦认为如果参与人I采取这个策略,而参与人II采取了相应的策略时,没有人想要改变这种状况

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

No, Player I doesn't have a dominated strategy.

不,参与者I没有劣势策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选