I think the answer may involve the possibility that at the beginning of the poem, there simply wasn't a clear distinction between the poet and the speaker.
答案可能包括了,在诗歌的开头,根本就没有一个清晰的区分的可能性。
So one thing you will quickly note is that there are no permanent answers in a study of political philosophy.
有一件你们会马上注意到的事,就是没有永恒的答案,可用以研究政治哲学。
This answer that says I just undercut Pepsi, that's true provided that Pepsi hasn't gone above the monopoly price.
比百事定价低点的答案,只有在百事没有高于,垄断价格时才是正确的
If you don't have the units, then if you say the answer is 19, then we don't know what it means.
如果没有的话,比如你的答案是十九,那我们就不知道这是什么意思
Nobody knows, but there's a theory which won't answer your question but will put it into a broader context.
没有人知道答案,但有这么个理论,它无法回答你的问题,但却能让你从更宽广的视角来看这个问题
Notice one last piece. If I'm going to do that, run through all possible answers, I still want to know, gee, what if there aren't any answers? How do I return that case?
注意最后一段,如果我要这样做,也就是运行所有可能的答案,我还是想知道要是没有结果呢?,在这个例子中应该返回什么呢?
- The answer to that is definitely no -- if they had the same electron configuration, they would, in fact be neon. But we can think about different ions that have this electron configuration.
答案是绝对没有-,如果它们具有相同的电子排布,那么它们,实际上,将都是氖,但是我们可以想一想,有没有其它离子具有这种电子排布呢?
Then you either got nothing at all, or you got very lame responses.
人们要么无言以对,要么就丢给你很没有说服力的答案。
Because there's probably no right answer here, but why might this approach be better? Yeah?
因为这里没有一个固定的答案,但是为什么这个方法更好点呢?,你说?
These are all plausible reasons and possible contributors but nobody's got the home run answer yet.
这些原因听起来都很有道理,但还没有人能给出准确的答案
There wasn't as much agreement on that, but one of the names suggested was Milwaukee; nothing has ever happened there in terms of real estate.
没有统一的答案,但是有人提到了应该是密尔沃基,那里的房地产市场有如死寂一般
But notice if it's a tie, that doesn't give us what we were looking for.
不过请注意,如果是平局,这还是没有给出我们想要的答案
Very good yes, and that's a big argument that nobody has a good answer for.
好问题,还没有人给出令人信服的答案
So a hundred years really before the invention of Game Theory, someone had figured out this answer for this game.
一百多年前博弈论还没有诞生呢,那时就有人解除了这个博弈的答案
Let's talk to the Beta's a second; let me just emphasize at this stage there are no wrong answers.
我们先来讨论一下选β的理由,我要强调一下这里没有错误的答案
bug This is an easy bug to come up with. But imagine, if you don't do the test, you're going to get answers that don't make any sense.
这是一个容易发现的,但是想象下,如果你没做测试的话,你会得到没有意义的答案,实际上。
There is obviously no magic solution to this question but the best answer I know of is Socrates.
这个问题,没有神奇的解答,但我认为最佳的答案是苏格拉底。
But at the end of the day, this program does in effect nothing because I'm not printing the answer, I'm not saving the answer, I'm not doing anything with the answer.
但最终这个程序都不会做什么有效地事情,因为我没有把答案打印出来,我没有保存那个答案,我没有对那个答案做相应的操作。
We have not yet found a satisfactory answer to what's the mass of an object?
我们还没有一个令人满意的答案,物体的质量到底是多少
So the most basic answer that doesn't explain why is just to say well, the s orbital is lower in energy than the p orbital, but we now have a more complete answer, so we can actually describe why that is.
所以最基本的答案是那没有解释,所以我们事实上可以描述,为什么是那样,但是我们现在有一个更复杂的答案,又是有效电荷量。
Right now there's no wrong answers.
但是现在没有错误的答案
Well, maybe the answer is there's no particular time at all when I killed him But for all that, it's true that I killed him ? What makes it true that I killed him?
也许答案是,我什么时候杀死他根本没有确切的时间,尽管如此,我杀死他是真的,为什么我杀死他是真的?
I don't have any very good answers for that and yet it is one part of the traditional explanation is this, and it's a very important one and much debated, that at a critical time in the battle one technique would be one side would give one great big shove.
我并没有令人满意的答案,目前还有一种传统解释,很重要,同时也饱受争议,那就是在战局千钧一发的时刻,有一项技术就是一方给对方致命一推
So if you haven't clicked in yet, or if you want to change your answer, keep in mind that you might need to jot down, - for example, a Lewis structure before you can answer this question.
如果你还没有点答案,或者你想改变你的答案,记住你也许需要在回答问题前写点东西,比如画一画Lewis结构,来得到最终。
Instead of taking that one vase, the thief could take two radios. And get more value. So the greedy thief, in some sense, gets the wrong answer. But maybe isn't so dumb.
这个贼可以带走两个收音机,这样总价值更大,因此这个贪婪的贼,在某种意义上没有得到正确的答案,但是可能它也不笨。
For those of you just walking in now, you might not have a chance to get all of the thought process that you need in on this clicker question, because it is based on a Lewis structure, so we will go over it.
那些刚刚进来的同学,你们可能没有机会时间来回答,因为答案是基于Lewis结构上的,所以我们赶紧看一下。
It grows as b. The 3 doesn't matter, it's just a constant, it's growing linearly.
它按b来增长,3只是个常量,3没有作用,答案是线性增长的。
应用推荐