• They can pretty much pack it up and go home, because everyone's going to think they're ridiculous, no one will believe what they say, and it's a stupid idea anyway, is basically the gist of this conversation.

    他们就可以打包回家了,因为每个都会认为他们很荒谬,没有人会相信他们的说法,这是个很愚蠢的想法,这就是他们当时谈话的大概意思。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • So you don't think the idea of implied consent is strong enough to generate any obligation at all to obey the government?

    就是说你认为默认同意的观点,并没有强到,足以让有服从政府的义务?

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • You might think the answer to that is no if we are physicalists but in fact it's not so clear the answer is no.

    如果我们是物理主义者你可能认为,不可能肉体不死,但其实答案没有那么明确。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • I think that might be the reason- no one knows what all their reasons were.

    认为也许这就是原因-,没有人知道他们所有的原因是什么。

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • Many people think search was a done deal. It's boring.

    很多人认为搜索没有开发空间,很无聊。

    斯坦福公开课 - 百度CEO李彦宏演讲:全球最大搜索引擎的发展课程节选

  • I don't think too many people and here are probably taking lithium.

    认为没有多少,包括在座的可能会吃锂。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • So it could be that they think that this is actually-- they haven't understood the experiment and they think this is a multi shot game, not a one shot game, good.

    可能是这些觉得这是,他们没有理解实验的目的,他们认为这是多次博弈而不是单次博弈

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Now that's pretty far fetched and not many people would say that a pop tart should be a controlled substance and regulated by government, but there are some very interesting chemical properties associated with foods like this that trigger things going on in the brain that affect us in a very big way.

    这多少有点牵强,而且也没有很多认为,这种果酱馅饼应归为管制品,并受到政府监管,但有趣的是这种食品,确实有一些特别的化学特性,它会作用于大脑并会对我们产生大的影响

    耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

  • It's a way to avoid the argument; although, for what it's worth, I should mention I don't myself believe that it's false that we have free will.

    这是回避这条论证的一种方法,尽管这条论证有它自身的价值,应该说,我个人认为,有自由意志,并没有

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • If we've got the monist who says there's bodies but there's no souls, you could imagine somebody who says there are souls but there are no bodies.

    如果一元论认为只有肉体,没有灵魂,你也能猜想有些会说,只有灵魂没有肉体

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • How many don't find it persuasive?

    有多少人认为没有说服力的?

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • And there's the physicalist view, according to which there are no souls.

    而物理主义,认为没有灵魂

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Then there are some who say the real problem here is the lack of consent, whether the lack of consent to a lottery, to a fair procedure or, Kathleen's idea, lack of consent at the moment of death.

    还有人认为,真正的问题在于,没有征得同意,不管是没有征得同意抽签,用公平程序进行,或者是凯思琳所说,没有征得派克的同意杀他。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • But at least it doesn't seem to be the sort of argument, unlike some of the arguments I've considered last time about oh, nobody believes they're going to die because you can't picture being dead or what have you.

    但这至少比我上次思考的,认为没有人相信自己会死,因为你不能想象死亡是什么样子,之类的论据有道理。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定