You don't get the more modest conclusion invisible things can't be destroyed or it's a whole lot harder to destroy them.
不是得出个更谦虚的结论,无形的东西不会毁灭或者,要毁灭它是不容易的。
Not the soul can't be destroyed or if it can be destroyed, it is very very hard and takes very very long time.
而不是灵魂不会毁灭,或者,如果可以毁灭,毁灭会很难,需要很长时间。
And then we'll see that he's going to use his principle to convince us or try to convince us that the soul is imortal, is indestructible.
然后我们会看到他打算,利用这一原理说服我们,或者试图说服我们,灵魂是不朽的,是不可毁灭的。
Socrates never says Simmias, here's what your objection goes wrong: harmony is not really invisible or can't be destroyed, whatever it is, so we don't have a counterexample.
苏格拉底从没说过,西米亚斯,你的观点在这里有错,和声并非无形或者不可毁灭,所以我们没有了反例。
应用推荐