I think Hartman is absolutely right to note that it's this aspect of Milton's similes that sets them entirely apart from the similes in any other epic poem.
我认为他注意到了弥尔顿明喻中的这个方面,是突出区别于其他诗歌中的明喻的,此举是非常恰当无误的。
Because if you are right that this would justify the taking of land in North America from Native Americans who didn't enclose it, if it's a good argument, then Locke's given us a justification for that.
因为如果你是对的,洛克此举将正义化从印第安人手中占领,他们尚未圈定的土地这一行为,如果他的观点是正确的,那么洛克给出了占领土地的正当理由。
From reading of such books," Hobbes continues, "men have undertaken to kill their kings because the Greek and Latin writers in their books and discourses of policy make it lawful and laudable for any man to do so provided before he do it he call him a tyrant."
正是因为这些阅读,他们意识到他们可以弑杀他们的君王,因为希腊和拉丁作家们,在他们的书籍和演讲中宣称,任何人都可以合法地弑杀他们的暴君,而且他们的此举也将是值得赞赏的“
But who began to divide them up into early and late elements, which I thought drove the field of classics insane for about 100 years, while folks argued about the unity of Homer, the unity or not the unity of one of the poems and so on.
他的成就在于第一个将其分成早期和晚期,此举颠覆了古典主义长达一个世纪,那时的人们对于荷马史诗中诗歌,是否具有同一性有过激烈的争论
应用推荐