Milton elaborates on this claim that we should read and prove anything we want, for we are sufficient to judge aright.

弥尔顿详尽阐明了这个论点，我们应该多读书,去求证自己想知道的所有事，因此我们才能够做正确的判断。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

a claim for the individual's capacity to make a moral judgment after some period of trial, or after some period of experimentation.

个人在一段时间的尝试后,或是在一段时间的实验后，去做正确判断的能力。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

Maybe that's the right diagnosis.

也许这才是正确的判断

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

We don't always want to go and solve the Schrodinger equation, and in fact, once we start talking about molecules, I can imagine none of you, as much as you love math or physics, want to be trying to solve this Schrodinger equation in that case either. So, what Lewis structures allow us to do is over 90% of the time be correct in terms of figuring out what the electron configuration is.

我们并不想每次都去解薛定谔方程，而且实际上，一旦我们开始讨论分子，我可以想象,你们中没有一个人，不管你有多么热爱数学或物理，会想去解这种情况下的薛定谔方程,总之，路易斯结构能让我们,有超过，90%，的概率判断出正确的,电子排布。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

And so similarly as Gmail's priority inbox, it's gonna be pretty flawed for a lot of us at least initially because it just doesn't know the answers a priori correctly unless we teach it or program it to be better. There is also another flaw in here or multiple flaws arguably.

类似于Gmail的优先收件箱，在起初使用时对大多数人来说它是有缺陷的,因为它不知道如何正确判断优先级,除非我们事先告诉它或编写程序改良它,另外这里存在一个或多个漏洞，可以说是缺陷。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选