So, he writes: To the psychologist alone can such questions occur as: Why do we smile when pleased and not scowl?

他这样写到：,对哲学家本身说,会出现这些问题：,为什么开心时我们微笑而非皱眉？

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

What both Derrida and de Man say about the difference when one thinks of language coming into being, from thinking about all those other things coming into being, is that language does not purport to stand outside of itself.

德里达和德曼都说的不同点,当一个人从其它所有事情的形成，想到语言的形成时，这个不同点是说语言并不会意图去站在它本身之外。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

It might be very important and insightful, but you're not saying anything especially interesting about death when you say everyone dies alone, if it's also true that everyone eats their lunch alone.

很重要，很有见地，但这样提出每个人都孤独而死时,并未对死亡本身提出什么有趣特别的见地，因为说每个人都孤独地吃中饭也是对的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Now, I hope you guys know that much calculus, that when you take a derivative of a function of a function, namely v square over 2 is a function of v, and v itself is a function of t, then the rule for taking the derivative is first take the v derivative of this object, then take the d by dt of t, which is this one.

我希望你们了解更多的微积分知识,当你对复合函数求导时,也就是说v^/2是关于v的函数,而v本身是关于t的函数,求导的法则应该是,第一步是这一部分对v求导,然后v再对t求导,得到这一部分

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

So although the personality with no branching rule avoids the problem of what to say about duplicates, by saying when there's branching,neither of them is Shelly Kagan, the branching rule itself seems very counter-intuitive.

所以纵然带有无分支规定的人格理论,避开了关于复制的问题，说当出现分支时，Shelly，Kagan就不复存在了，这个无分支规定本身就很反直觉。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选