And by this time all educated Roman men were expected to be able to speak Greek, well if possible.
那时所有受过教育的罗马男子,有可能的话,都要会说希腊语。
Basically the goal is so that everyone should have a chance of getting a same education here
基本目的就是人人都可以有机会受到同样的教育,
If the goal is to improve education, then one has to ask hard questions Like does a technology actually help?
假如目标是提高教育,那就要问问这样的问题,技术真的有帮助吗?
Students come from education, business, law, medicine, etc, bringing in their own credentials with them.
学生来自教育,商业,法律,医疗等各个领域,都有自己的文凭。
Southern slaveholding leadership, in particular, were very suspicious of the spread of literacy.
特别是南方蓄奴派的领导,对传播文化教育有相当的成见
There's like a 60's, there's an Asian class, a sex cluster... There's lot of different topics
有60年代,亚洲教育课,性教育课……有很多不同的主题,
Paideia The Greek word paideia, which is right there on your handout, means education, but it also means more than simply rote learning or memorization or learning to read, like we think.
希腊词,讲义上有,意思是教育,但不仅如此,它不仅仅指我们想的那种,死记硬背式的教育。
It's been shown that higher levels of education correlate with high voter turnout.
有研究显示,教育程度越高,选民的参与度越高。
Fish imagines Milton as always on some level slapping the reader's wrist, reminding the reader of his or her fallen-ness, that there's a constant pedagogical correction going on.
费什想象弥尔顿总是在某种程度上斥责着读者们,提醒他们自身的堕落,并且诗中有一种持续的教育性的纠正在重复出现。
Not so easy to see. All right, but this is actually a great one of those educational moments. This is a great example to think recursively. If I wanted to think about this problem recursively- what do I mean by thinking recursively?
看不太出来,好,但实际上是一个有教育意义的时刻,这是一个很好的关于递归的例子,如果我用递归的思想,去考虑这个问题-,我该怎么用递归去解决这个问题呢?
The institutional and educational requirements of Plato's Republic share many features with a place like Yale.
柏拉图《理想国》的制度,与教育条件特色,有许多方面和耶鲁是共通的。
And how much of it is the product of culture, of language, of schooling?
又有多少是文化的产物,语言的产物,或是教育的产物
and having same education, like goals as you.
接受同样的教育,跟你有同样的目标。
It's a misnomer, but the historical transmutation of Milton's title we have to take as instructive.
这是一个误称,但弥尔顿作品标题的历史变化,对于我们来说是有教育性的。
Nothing is said here about the education of farmers, artisans, merchants, laborers, the economic class.
这里并没有谈及,农夫的教育,或是工匠、商人、劳工,及有产阶级。
应用推荐