In other words, Iser is no more an historicist than Gadamer is but insists rather on the mutual exchange of prejudice between the two horizons in question.
换句话说就是,伊瑟尔并不比葛达玛更历史主义,但他相反却坚持在两个有争执的视域中,偏见的互换。
I think there's a bias towards optimism among business economists or among business people in general.
我想大部分人都对乐观的,商业经济学家或者商人有偏见。
As Gadamer says, this is the characteristic idea of the Enlightenment: its prejudice against prejudice, that we can be objective, Okay, fine. But prejudice is bad, we know prejudice is bad.
如伽达默尔所说,这是启蒙运动时期的标志性观点:,对偏见有偏见,我们应该客观,好,但是偏见是不对的,我们知道偏见是不对的。
So, African Americans also are biased against African Americans and in favor of white Americans, showing it doesn't reduce to group favoritism though that probably plays a big role.
所以黑人也是,对黑人有偏见,倾向于白人,这样表明组内偏爱,所起的影响并不大。
And scholarship of the nineteenth century and most of the twentieth century is generally characterized by a deep-seated bias that views impurity rules as primitive and irrational taboos, and sacrifice as controlled savagery that's empty of any spiritual meaning.
十九世纪和二十世纪的大部分时期,学术界都有一个,很深层的偏见,那就是认为不纯的规则是,原始且无理的,献祭是野蛮人才干得出来的,无任何精神意义的活动。
Well, Gadamer doesn't talk about this obviously, but it is an aspect of that prejudice that one might share with tradition if one weren't somewhat more critical than this gesture of sharing might indicate.
伽达默尔并没有明确地这样说,但一个人有可能有这样的偏见,如果他不对传统中的某些东西,加以批判。
I mean, if you do the--If you look at the results for the study, it turns out that there is an association as bias to view white Americans as positive and African Americans as negative but it shows up in half a second difference.
如果你看这些研究的结果,你会发现人们有一种偏见,把白人和积极的意义联系在一起,把黑人与消极的意义联系在一起,你只有看这半秒的差别,才能发现这种偏见。
应用推荐