I could generalize this pretty nicely. Imagine the same kind of idea where I want to simply say I want to take input of anything and try and see how to make sure I get the right kind of thing. I want to make it polymorphic.

对吧，我试着输入浮点数,我能更好的一般化它,想象下类似的想法，我需要输入些什么,然后看看输入的是否正确,我想使他更多元化些。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

To figure out even what this thing is, let alone how to use it properly. So, you know, I'm sympathetic.

就连认出这是什么东西（都很困难），更别说正确应用它了，所以我很同情这点。

经常犯的失误 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

So, let's consider some people got it wrong, however, and let's see where that wrong answer might have come from, or actually, more importantly, let's see how we can all get to the correct answer.

我们来考虑一下为什么有些人做错了，然而我们来看看,这个错误的答案从何而来，或者事实上更重要的，我们来看看怎样才能都得到正确答案。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

But I want to stress again, as long as I do the base case right and my inductive or recursive step reduces it to a smaller version of the same problem, the code will in fact converge and give me out an answer.

就开心的去做吧,但是我想再次强调,只要基础事件处理正确而我的递归,或递推步骤能把它简化为更简单的同类问题,那么这段代码就可以收敛。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

And over time,as a result of many of these studies, result of examination result of asking also the right questions, I have become happier.

随着时间的推移，出现了很多这类研究，由于提出了正确的问题，我变得更快乐。

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

They suggest there is something in the genes that explains the characteristics of particular people; that is certainly not true. So let's understand each other.

他们认为基因的某些特点,决定了特定人群的特征,这显然是不正确的,让我说得更明白点

耶鲁公开课 - 古希腊历史简介课程节选

It's a tragic circumstance but better to kill one so that five can live, is that the reason most of you had, those of you who would turn? Yes?

虽然是悲剧,但牺牲一人保全五人依然是更正确的选择，这就是大多数人选择把电车开上侧轨的理由吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

And he quite correctly, because he's more senior than I am, more experienced than I am, said it's actually a good thing.

你可以用加法来加浮点数，他很明显是正确的，因为他比我年长些，比我更有经验些。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选